Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Summary
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (168)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SHILS, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by JANOWITZ, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Public Opinion Quarterly 12:280-315 (1948)
© 1948 American Association for Public Opinion Research

Cohesion and Disintegration in the Wehrmacht in World War II

EDWARD A. SHILS and MORRIS JANOWITZ

Professor Shils is a member of the faculty of the University of Chicago and of the London School of Economics. Dr. Janowitz also teaches at the University of Chicago. During the war, both served in the Intelligence Section of the Psychological Warfare Division of SHAEF.

The title of this article may suggest to some that it is of interst only to the student of military affairs. But it is of a far wider scope. The Public relations expert, the opinion analyst, the propagandist, the educator, and all those who are interested in relating attitudes to the psychology of the individual and the structure of the group will find it deserving of close attention. For the authors, in attempting to determine why the German Army in World War II fought so stub-bornly to the end, have made an intensive study of the social structure of this army, of the symbols to which it responded, of the Nazi attempts to bolster its morale, and the Allied attempts to break it down. They have found a key to many of the behavior and attitude patterns of the individual infantryman in the interpersonal relationships within the company—his primary group. His relationship to this primary group goes far to explain why he reponds to one appeal and not to another, why he fights, and why he surrenders. This study thus provides an example of the sociological and psychological analysis which the propagandist must make if he is to obtain maximal response to his communications.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Armed Forces & SocietyHome page
G. L. Siebold
Book Review: Pipping, K. (1947/2008). Infantry Company as a Society (Publication Series 1, No. 3/2008), edited and translated by P. Kekale. Helsinki, Finland: Department of Behavioural Sciences, National Defence University
Armed Forces & Society, January 1, 2010; 36(2): 387 - 390.
[PDF]


Home page
Armed Forces & SocietyHome page
D. R. Segal and M. G. Ender
Sociology in Military Officer Education
Armed Forces & Society, October 1, 2008; 35(1): 3 - 15.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
N. Greenberg, A. Iversen, L. Hull, D. Bland, and S. Wessely
Getting a peace of the action: measures of post traumatic stress in UK military peacekeepers
J R Soc Med, February 1, 2008; 101(2): 78 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Armed Forces & SocietyHome page
G. L. Siebold
The Essence of Military Group Cohesion
Armed Forces & Society, January 1, 2007; 33(2): 286 - 295.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
J. Pooley
Fifteen Pages that Shook the Field: Personal Influence, Edward Shils, and the Remembered History of Mass Communication Research
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, November 1, 2006; 608(1): 130 - 156.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Armed Forces & SocietyHome page
D. R. Herspring
Undermining Combat Readiness in the Russian Military, 1992-2005
Armed Forces & Society, July 1, 2006; 32(4): 513 - 531.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Armed Forces & SocietyHome page
R. J. MacCoun, E. Kier, and A. Belkin
Does Social Cohesion Determine Motivation in Combat?: An Old Question with an Old Answer
Armed Forces & Society, July 1, 2006; 32(4): 646 - 654.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Armed Forces & SocietyHome page
L. Wong
Combat Motivation in Today's Soldiers: U.S. Army War College Strategic Studies Institute
Armed Forces & Society, July 1, 2006; 32(4): 659 - 663.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Armed Forces & SocietyHome page
U. Ben-Shalom, Z. Lehrer, and E. Ben-Ari
Cohesion during Military Operations: A Field Study on Combat Units in the Al-Aqsa Intifada
Armed Forces & Society, October 1, 2005; 32(1): 63 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
S. WESSELY
Risk, psychiatry and the military
The British Journal of Psychiatry, June 1, 2005; 186(6): 459 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
S. WESSELY
War stories: Invited commentary on... Documented combat exposure of US veterans seeking treatment for combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder
The British Journal of Psychiatry, June 1, 2005; 186(6): 473 - 475.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GazetteHome page
H. Shah
Communication and Nation Building: Comparing US Models of Ethnic Assimilation and `Third World' Modernization
International Communication Gazette, April 1, 2003; 65(2): 165 - 181.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Current SociologyHome page
G. Harries-Jenkins
Women in Extended Roles in the Military: Legal Issues
Current Sociology, September 1, 2002; 50(5): 745 - 769.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
S.-W. Kim, J. L. Price, C. W. Mueller, and T. W. Watson
The Determinants of Career Intent Among Physicians at a U.S. Air Force Hospital
Human Relations, July 1, 1996; 49(7): 947 - 976.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory Culture SocietyHome page
A. Lingis
The Postmodern Economic High-Growth Society
Theory Culture Society, February 1, 1994; 11(1): 171 - 187.



Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
M. Hazani
Prevention of Delinquency Through Repentance: An Ethnographic Study in a Jerusalem Slum
Small Group Research, February 1, 1987; 18(1): 82 - 98.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
E. Litwak
Complementary Roles for Formal and Informal Support Groups: A Study of Nursing Homes and Mortality Rates
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, October 1, 1985; 21(4): 407 - 425.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science polHome page
M. Lodge and J. C. Wahlke
Politicos, Apoliticals, and the Processing of Political Information
International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science pol, January 1, 1982; 3(1): 131 - 160.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Current SociologyHome page
Bibliography
Current Sociology, December 1, 1981; 29(3): 83 - 164.



Home page
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
R. A. Peterson and H. G. White
Elements of Simplex Structure
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, April 1, 1981; 10(1): 3 - 24.



Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
P. Blunt
Bureaucracy and Ethnicty in Kenya: Some Conjectures for the Eighties
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, July 1, 1980; 16(3): 336 - 353.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
T. Baumgartner, W. Buckley, and T. Burns
Relational Control: The Human Structuring of Cooperation and Conflict
Journal of Conflict Resolution, September 1, 1975; 19(3): 417 - 440.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
T.J. Scheff
Intersubjectivity and Emotion
American Behavioral Scientist, March 1, 1973; 16(4): 501 - 511.



Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
P. C. Rosenblatt
Origins and effects of group ethnocentrism and nationalism
Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 1964; 8(2): 131 - 146.
[PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
M. Mulder and A. Stemerding
Threat, Attraction to Group, and Need for Strong Leadership: A Laboratory Experiment in a Natural Setting
Human Relations, November 1, 1963; 16(4): 317 - 334.
[PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.