Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Summary
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dillman, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Frey, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Public Opinion Quarterly 40:66-78 (1976)
© 1976 American Association for Public Opinion Research

Reducing Refusal Rates for Telephone Interviews*

Don A. Dillman, Jean Gorton Gallegos and James H. Frey

Don A. Dillman is Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, and Chairman, Department of Rural Sociology, Washington State University. Jean Gorton Gallegos is Community Development Coordinator, City of Bellingham, Washington. James H. Frey is Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

In two experiments, refusal rates to telephone interviews were not affected by substantial changes in the introductory remarks of the interviewer. A prior letter significantly lowered refusal rates in a third experiment. In all three, interviewer sex had no effect.


* An earlier version of this article was presented at the annual meetings of the Pacific Sociological Association, San Jose, California, March 28, 1974. Funds for this research were provided by the Social Research Center and under Project 0031 of the Agricultural Research Center, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99163. Data were collected through the facilities of the Social Research Center's Public Opinion Laboratory. This is scientific paper #4245 of the Agricultural Research Center.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
K. M. Dunn
Invited Commentary: Topical Threats to Epidemiology
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 1, 2008; 167(1): 20 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
C. Farris and A. Holtzworth-Munroe
Representative Sampling of Maritally Violent and Nonviolent Couples: A Feasibility Study
J Interpers Violence, December 1, 2007; 22(12): 1613 - 1622.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
E. D. Leeuw, M. Callegaro, J. Hox, E. Korendijk, and G. Lensvelt-Mulders
The Influence of Advance Letters on Response in Telephone Surveys: A Meta-Analysis
Public Opin Q, September 1, 2007; 71(3): 413 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
A. L. Holbrook, I. C. Farrar, and S. J. Popkin
Surveying a Chicago Public Housing Development: Methodological Challenges and Lessons Learned
Eval Rev, December 1, 2006; 30(6): 779 - 802.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Public Opin ResHome page
W. van der Vaart, Y. Ongena, A. Hoogendoorn, and W. Dijkstra
Do Interviewers' Voice Characteristics Influence Cooperation Rates in Telephone Surveys?
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., December 1, 2006; 18(4): 488 - 499.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
C. B. Mann
Do Advance Letters Improve Preelection Forecast Accuracy?
Public Opin Q, December 1, 2005; 69(4): 561 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
M. W. Link and A. Mokdad
Advance Letters as a Means of Improving Respondent Cooperation in Random Digit Dial Studies: A Multistate Experiment
Public Opin Q, December 1, 2005; 69(4): 572 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
L. A. Hembroff, D. Rusz, A. Rafferty, H. McGee, and N. Ehrlich
The Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Advance Mailings in a Telephone Survey
Public Opin Q, June 1, 2005; 69(2): 232 - 245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
H. HOUTKOOP-STEENSTRA and H. van den BERGH
Effects of Introductions in Large-Scale Telephone Survey Interviews
Sociological Methods Research, February 1, 2000; 28(3): 281 - 300.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
D. W. MAYNARD and N. C. SCHAEFFER
Keeping the Gate: Declinations of the Request to Participate in a Telephone Survey Interview
Sociological Methods Research, August 1, 1997; 26(1): 34 - 79.
[Abstract]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
M. Neiman
Government Directed Change of Everyday Life and Coproduction: the Case of Home Energy Use
Political Research Quarterly, September 1, 1989; 42(3): 365 - 389.
[PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
R. E. Snow, J. E. Prather, and J. D. Hutcheson JR
Program Evaluation Using a Follow-Up Telephone Survey: The Effects of a Prior Letter
Eval Rev, January 1, 1986; 10(1): 85 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.