Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Summary
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goudy, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Public Opinion Quarterly 40:360-369 (1976)
© 1976 American Association for Public Opinion Research

Nonresponse Effects on Relationships Between Variables

Willis J. Goudy

Willis J. Goudy is an Associate Professor in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. Journal Paper No. J-8362 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa. Project No. 2010. This investigation was supported in part through grant number 10-P-57495/7-01 from the Social Security Administration, Washington, D. C. The author wishes to thank Richard D. Warren and Charles L. Mulford for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article.

To examine nonresponse effects on variable relationships, data from a panel study of 1,870 older Iowa residents are reported. When data are accumulated by wave of response, differences are minor on variable distributions (percentage, mean, standard deviation), bivariate relationships (correlation), and multivariate relationships (regression), suggesting that the assumed impact of nonresponse bias on variable relationships has been overstated.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
R. M. Groves and E. Peytcheva
The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias: A Meta-Analysis
Public Opin Q, June 1, 2008; 72(2): 167 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative ResearchHome page
M. Thomas, M. Bloor, and J. Frankland
The process of sample recruitment: an ethnostatistical perspective
Qualitative Research, November 1, 2007; 7(4): 429 - 446.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
S. V. Lankford, B. P. Buxton, R. Hetzler, and J. R. Little
Response Bias and Wave Analysis of Mailed Questionnaires in Tourism Impact Assessments
Journal of Travel Research, April 1, 1995; 33(4): 8 - 13.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
R. G. Rylander, D. B. Propst, and T. R. Mcmurtry
Nonresponse and Recall Biases in a Survey of Traveler Spending
Journal of Travel Research, April 1, 1995; 33(4): 39 - 45.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
W. P. Stewart, B. S. Anderson, D. R. Fesenmaier, and C.-C. Lue
Highway Welcome Center Surveys: Problems with Nonresponse Bias
Journal of Travel Research, January 1, 1993; 31(3): 53 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
D. Stork and W. D. Richards
Nonrespondents in Communication Network Studies: Problems and Possibilities
Group Organization Management, June 1, 1992; 17(2): 193 - 209.
[Abstract]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
J. Sobal and K. S. Ferentz
Response
Eval Health Prof, September 1, 1990; 13(3): 367 - 372.
[PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
J. Sobal and K. S. Ferentz
Comparing Physicians' Responses to the First and Second Mailings of a Questionnaire
Eval Health Prof, September 1, 1989; 12(3): 329 - 339.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
M. Goodfellow, N.-E. Kiernan, F. Ahern, and M. A. Smyer
Response Bias Using Two-Stage Data Collection: A Study of Elderly Participants in a Program
Eval Rev, December 1, 1988; 12(6): 638 - 654.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
R. FITZGERALD and L. FULLER
I Hear You Knocking But You Can't Come In: The Effects of Reluctant Respondents and Refusers on Sample Survey Estimates
Sociological Methods Research, August 1, 1982; 11(1): 3 - 32.
[Abstract]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.