Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Summary
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (56)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BISHOP, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by BENNETT, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Public Opinion Quarterly 44:198-209 (1980)
© 1980 American Association for Public Opinion Research

Pseudo-Opinions on Public Affairs

GEORGE F. BISHOP, ROBERT W. OLDENDICK, ALFRED J. TUCHFARBER and STEPHEN E. BENNETT

George F. Bishop is a Senior Research Associate, Robert W. Oldendick is a Research Associate, and Alfred J. Tuchfarber is Director, Behavioral Sciences Laboratory at the University of Cincinnati. Stephen E. Bennett is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Cincinnati. The research reported here was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (SOC78-07407). The authors want to thank Howard Schuman and Stanley Presser for their comments on a presentation of a previous version of this paper at the annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Buck Hill Falls, Pennsylvania, June 1979.

This article reports on the often suspected but rarely researched tendency of survey respondents to give opinions on topics to which they have given little or no thought. The findings, based on a question about a fictitious public affairs issue, do show that the magnitude of the problem is substantial. But the data also demonstrate that this phenomenon does not represent simple random error, reflecting instead basic social-psychological dispositions which can be elicited, unwittingly, in the context of the interview.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
J. R. Cummings, T. Rice, and Y. Hanoch
Who Thinks That Part D Is Too Complicated?: Survey Results on the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit
Med Care Res Rev, February 1, 2009; 66(1): 97 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science InformationHome page
J. Turner and M. Michael
What do we know about "don't knows"? Or, contexts of "ignorance"
Social Science Information, March 1, 1996; 35(1): 15 - 37.
[Abstract]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
L. K. Pifer
Adolescents and animal research: stable attitudes or ephemeral opinions?
Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 1994; 3(3): 291 - 307.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
D. I. Hawkins, K. A. Coney, and D. W. Jackson JR
The Impact of Monetary Inducement on Uninformed Response Error
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, June 1, 1988; 16(2): 30 - 35.
[Abstract]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.