Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Summary
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DEMAIO, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Public Opinion Quarterly 44:223-233 (1980)
© 1980 American Association for Public Opinion Research

Refusals: Who, Where and Why

THERESA J. DEMAIO

Theresa J. DeMaio is a survey statistician at the U.S. Bureau of the Census. The author wishes to acknowledge the assistance of her coworkers at the Bureau, in particular Naomi D. Rothwell, who designed and made arrangements for the reports on which this paper is based, and who critically reviewed drafts of it.

The characteristics of a very small group of people who refused to participate in a personal interview panel study are investigated in this article. Comparisons are made between characteristics of respondents and refusers in the initial interview and subsequent interviews. Details of the refusal situation and reasons given by refusers for their noncooperation are also discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eval RevHome page
T. Kolar and I. Kolar
What Respondents Really Expect From Researchers
Eval Rev, August 1, 2008; 32(4): 363 - 391.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
Y. Baruch and B. C. Holtom
Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research
Human Relations, August 1, 2008; 61(8): 1139 - 1160.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative ResearchHome page
M. Thomas, M. Bloor, and J. Frankland
The process of sample recruitment: an ethnostatistical perspective
Qualitative Research, November 1, 2007; 7(4): 429 - 446.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
H. Roose, J. Lievens, and H. Waege
The Joint Effect of Topic Interest and Follow-Up Procedures on the Response in a Mail Questionnaire: An Empirical Test of the Leverage-Saliency Theory in Audience Research
Sociological Methods Research, February 1, 2007; 35(3): 410 - 428.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
J. E. Crowley, B. H. Roff, and J. Lynch
Encouraging Survey Participation Among Individuals Seeking HIV Prevention Services: Does a Community Identity Match Help or Hurt?
Health Educ Behav, February 1, 2007; 34(1): 55 - 70.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
S. Poggione
Exploring Gender Differences in State Legislators' Policy Preferences
Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2004; 57(2): 305 - 314.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
J. PICKERY, G. LOOSVELDT, and A. CARTON
The Effects of Interviewer and Respondent Characteristics on Response Behavior in Panel Surveys: A Multilevel Approach
Sociological Methods Research, May 1, 2001; 29(4): 509 - 523.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
R. G. Rylander, D. B. Propst, and T. R. Mcmurtry
Nonresponse and Recall Biases in a Survey of Traveler Spending
Journal of Travel Research, April 1, 1995; 33(4): 39 - 45.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Research on AgingHome page
J. A. Dodge, N. M. Clark, N. K. Janz, J. Lhang, and M. A. Schork
Nonparticipation of Older Adults in a Heart Disease Self-Management Project: Factors Influencing Involvement
Research on Aging, June 1, 1993; 15(2): 220 - 237.
[Abstract]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
M. Goodfellow, N.-E. Kiernan, F. Ahern, and M. A. Smyer
Response Bias Using Two-Stage Data Collection: A Study of Elderly Participants in a Program
Eval Rev, December 1, 1988; 12(6): 638 - 654.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
R. FITZGERALD and L. FULLER
I Hear You Knocking But You Can't Come In: The Effects of Reluctant Respondents and Refusers on Sample Survey Estimates
Sociological Methods Research, August 1, 1982; 11(1): 3 - 32.
[Abstract]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.