Public Opinion Quarterly 47:68-83 (1983)
© 1983 American Association for Public Opinion Research
The Effect of Interviewer Characteristics and Expectations on Response
Eleanor Singer is a Senior Research Associate at the Center for the Social Sciences. Martin R. Frankel is Professor of Statistics at Baruch College, CUNY. Marc B. Glassman is an independent statistical consultant in New York City. The authors wish to thank Ed Blair, Charles F. Cannell, Howard Schuman, and Seymour Sudman for reading and commenting on an earlier draft of the paper. The research was made possible by grant SES-78-19797 to the senior author.
This study reports on two sets of findings related to interviewer effects, derived from a national RDD sample of the adult population. The first of these concerns the effect of interviewer characteristics and expectations on overall cooperation rates; the second, the effect of interviewer characteristics and expectations on item nonresponse and response quality. We found that interviewers' age, the size of the interviewing assignment, and interviewers' expectations all had a strong effect on overall cooperation rates; the relation of experience to response rate was curvilinear in this sample. Age and education have consistent but statistically insignificant effects on item nonresponse. The effect of interviewers' expectations on responses within the interview resembles that in earlier studies, but is less pronounced and less consistent.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. E. Davis, M. P. Couper, N. K. Janz, C. H. Caldwell, and K. Resnicow Interviewer effects in public health surveys Health Educ. Res., September 17, 2009; (2009) cyp046v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Harris, D. Kelly, J. A Hunt, H. Plant, K. Kelley, A. Richardson, and J. Sitzia Accessing elite nurses for research: reflections on the theoretical and practical issues of telephone interviewing Journal of Research in Nursing, May 1, 2008; 13(3): 236 - 248. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Thomas, M. Bloor, and J. Frankland The process of sample recruitment: an ethnostatistical perspective Qualitative Research, November 1, 2007; 7(4): 429 - 446. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Olson and A. Peytchev Effect of Interviewer Experience on Interview Pace and Interviewer Attitudes Public Opin Q, June 7, 2007; (2007) nfm007v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Link Predicting the Persistence and Performance of Newly Recruited Telephone Interviewers Field Methods, August 1, 2006; 18(3): 305 - 320. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Bozeman The Internet's Impact on Policy Evaluation: Information Compression and Credibility Eval Rev, April 1, 2004; 28(2): 156 - 174. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-M. N. Andersen and J. Olsen Do Interviewers' Health Beliefs and Habits Modify Responses to Sensitive Questions? A Study using Data Collected from Pregnant Women by Means of Computer-assisted Telephone Interviews Am. J. Epidemiol., January 1, 2002; 155(1): 95 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. PICKERY, G. LOOSVELDT, and A. CARTON The Effects of Interviewer and Respondent Characteristics on Response Behavior in Panel Surveys: A Multilevel Approach Sociological Methods Research, May 1, 2001; 29(4): 509 - 523. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. HOUTKOOP-STEENSTRA and H. van den BERGH Effects of Introductions in Large-Scale Telephone Survey Interviews Sociological Methods Research, February 1, 2000; 28(3): 281 - 300. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Parsons, T. P. Johnson, R. B. Warnecke, and A. Kaluzny The Effect of Interviewer Characteristics On Gatekeeper Resistance in Surveys of Elite Populations Eval Rev, April 1, 1993; 17(2): 131 - 143. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Johanson, C. J. Gips, and C. E. Rich "If You Can'T Say Something Nice": A Variation on the Social Desirability Response Set Eval Rev, February 1, 1993; 17(1): 116 - 122. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Dworkin Interviewer Preferences for Respondent Groups Eval Health Prof, September 1, 1989; 12(3): 282 - 299. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||








