| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Public Opinion Quarterly 52:161-173 (1988)
© 1988 American Association for Public Opinion Research
PERCEIVED IMPACT OF DEFAMATION
AN EXPERIMENT ON THIRD-PERSON EFFECTS
Stanford University
Stanford University
University of Michigan
University of Minnesota
This paper explores the intersection of libel law and communication theory that occurs when libel juries assess the effect of a defamatory communication on others. The third-person hypothesis suggests that people often assume others will be more affected by potentially persuasive communications than they are themselves. An experiment was conducted in which students were exposed to a variety of defamatory newspaper articles. The results confirmed several predictions. First, readers estimated that others would be more affected by defamatory messages than the readers themselves would be. Second, this effect was magnified as the "others" became progressively more distant from these readers. Third, when the defamation was attributed to a negatively biased source the effect was also accentuated: readers themselves discounted the message, while assuming others would be even more influenced. It is suggested that courtroom assessments of the effects of defamatory communications on others may be influenced by such third-person perceptions.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  I. Huck, O. Quiring, and H.-B. Brosius Perceptual Phenomena in the Agenda Setting Process Int. J. Public Opin. Res., June 1, 2009; 21(2): 139 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. B. Oliver, H. Yang, S. Ramasubramanian, J. Kim, and S. Lee Exploring Implications of Perceived Media Reinforcement on Third-Person Perceptions Communication Research, December 1, 2008; 35(6): 745 - 769. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. P. Boyle, D. M. McLeod, and H. Rojas The Role of Ego Enhancement and Perceived Message Exposure in Third-Person Judgments Concerning Violent Video Games American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 165 - 185. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. J. Golan, S. A. Banning, and L. Lundy Likelihood to Vote, Candidate Choice, and the Third-Person Effect: Behavioral Implications of Political Advertising in the 2004 Presidential Election American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 278 - 290. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Huh, D. E. DeLorme, and L. N. Reid Operationalizing the Second-Person Effect and Its Relationship to Behavioral Outcomes of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 186 - 207. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Y. Choi, G. Leshner, and J. Choi Third-Person Effects of Idealized Body Image in Magazine Advertisements American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 147 - 164. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. G. Day Out of the Living Room and Into the Voting Booth: An Analysis of Corporate Public Affairs Advertising Under the Third-Person Effect American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 243 - 260. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Pease and P. R. Brewer The Oprah Factor: The Effects of a Celebrity Endorsement in a Presidential Primary Campaign International Journal of Press/Politics, October 1, 2008; 13(4): 386 - 400. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Cho and F. J. Boster First and Third Person Perceptions on Anti-Drug Ads Among Adolescents Communication Research, April 1, 2008; 35(2): 169 - 189. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. M. Chock, J. R. Fox, J. R. Angelini, S. Lee, and A. Lang Telling Me Quickly: How Arousing Fast-Paced PSAs Decrease Self-Other Differences Communication Research, December 1, 2007; 34(6): 618 - 636. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. M. Kepplinger and S. Glaab Research Note: Reciprocal Effects of Negative Press Reports European Journal of Communication, September 1, 2007; 22(3): 337 - 354. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H.-J. Paek and A. C. Gunther How Peer Proximity Moderates Indirect Media Influence on Adolescent Smoking Communication Research, August 1, 2007; 34(4): 407 - 432. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Huh and R. Langteau Presumed Influence of DTC Prescription Drug Advertising: Do Experts and Novices Think Differently? Communication Research, February 1, 2007; 34(1): 25 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. Pan, J. L. Abisaid, H.-J. Paek, Y. Sun, and D. Houden Exploring the Perceptual Gap in Perceived Effects of Media Reports of Opinion Polls Int. J. Public Opin. Res., September 1, 2006; 18(3): 340 - 350. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Tsfati and J. Cohen The Influence of Presumed Media Influence on Democratic Legitimacy: The Case of Gaza Settlers Communication Research, December 1, 2005; 32(6): 794 - 821. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. C. Meirick Rethinking the Target Corollary: The Effects of Social Distance, Perceived Exposure, and Perceived Predispositions on First-Person and Third-Person Perceptions Communication Research, December 1, 2005; 32(6): 822 - 843. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H.-J. Paek, Z. Pan, Y. Sun, J. Abisaid, and D. Houden The Third-Person Perception as Social Judgment: An Exploration of Social Distance and Uncertainty in Perceived Effects of Political Attack Ads Communication Research, April 1, 2005; 32(2): 143 - 170. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. C. Meirick Topic-Relevant Reference Groups and Dimensions of Distance: Political Advertising and First- and Third-Person Effects Communication Research, April 1, 2004; 31(2): 234 - 255. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. C. Chia, K.-H. Lu, and D. M. McLeod Sex, Lies, and Video Compact Disc: A Case Study on Third-Person Perception and Motivations for Media Censorship Communication Research, February 1, 2004; 31(1): 109 - 130. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. David, G. Morrison, M. A. Johnson, and F. Ross Body Image, Race, and Fashion Models: Social Distance and Social Identification in Third-Person Effects Communication Research, June 1, 2002; 29(3): 270 - 294. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. CHAPIN Third-Person Perception and Optimistic Bias Among Urban Minority At-Risk Youth Communication Research, February 1, 2000; 27(1): 51 - 81. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. HENRIKSEN and J. A. FLORA Third-Person Perception and Children: Perceived Impact of Pro- and Anti-Smoking Ads Communication Research, December 1, 1999; 26(6): 643 - 665. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. B. SALWEN and M. DUPAGNE The Third-Person Effect: Perceptions of the Media's Influence and Immoral Consequences Communication Research, October 1, 1999; 26(5): 523 - 549. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. P. EVELAND JR., A. I. NATHANSON, B. H. DETENBER, and D. M. McLEOD Rethinking the Social Distance Corollary: Perceived Likelihood of Expsoure and the Third-Person Perception Communication Research, June 1, 1999; 26(3): 275 - 302. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. V. SHAH, R. J. FABER, and S. YOUN Susceptibility and Severity: Perceptual Dimensions Underlying the Third-Person Effect Communication Research, April 1, 1999; 26(2): 240 - 267. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. C. GUNTHER The Persuasive Press Inference: Effects of Mass Media on Perceived Public Opinion Communication Research, October 1, 1998; 25(5): 486 - 504. [Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. B. SALWEN Perceptions of Media Influence and Support for Censorship: The Third-Person Effect in the 1996 Presidential Election Communication Research, June 1, 1998; 25(3): 259 - 285. [Abstract]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M. Duck, D. J. Terry, and M. A. Hogg Perceptions of a Media Campaign: The Role of Social Identity and the Changing Intergroup Context Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 1998; 24(1): 3 - 16. [Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. M. McLEOD, W. P. EVELAND Jr., and A. I. NATHANSON Support for Censorship of Violent and Misogynic Rap Lyrics: An Analysis of the Third-Person Effect Communication Research, April 1, 1997; 24(2): 153 - 174. [Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. C. GUNTHER and E. THORSON Perceived Persuasive Effects of Product Commercials and Public Service Announcements: Third-Person Effects in New Domains Communication Research, October 1, 1992; 19(5): 574 - 596. [Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. GUNTHER What We Think Others Think: Cause and Consequence in the Third-Person Effect Communication Research, June 1, 1991; 18(3): 355 - 372. [Abstract]
|
|