Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Summary
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (180)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by YAMMARINO, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by CHILDERS, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Public Opinion Quarterly 55:613-639 (1991)
© 1991 American Association for Public Opinion Research

UNDERSTANDING MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE BEHAVIOR A META-ANALYSIS

FRANCIS J. YAMMARINO, STEVEN J. SKINNER and TERRY L. CHILDERS

School of Management and Center for Leadership Studies, State University of New York at Binghamton, P.O. Box 6000, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000
College of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

Correspondence regarding this article should be addressed to FRANCIS J. YAMMARINO

A meta-analysis of prior studies of techniques designed to induce mail survey response rates was conducted. Research encompassing 184 effects (study outcomes) in 115 studies (articles) for 17 predictors of response rate was examined. The average effect size across all manipulations was r=.065, indicating an average increase of about 6.5 percent in response rates for manipulations. Effect sizes for specific predictors and two potential moderators of effects were examined. Results indicated that repeated contacts in the form of preliminary notification and follow-ups, appeals, inclusion of a return envelope, postage, and monetary incentives, were effective in increasing survey response rates. Significant effect sizes for the predictors ranged from an increase in response of 2 percent to 31 percent. Implications of the results for the conduct of mail surveys and future research on mail survey response behavior are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
K. R. Bartkus, R. D. Howell, S. Barlow Hills, and J. Blackham
The Quality of Guest Comment Cards: An Empirical Study of U.S. Lodging Chains
Journal of Travel Research, November 1, 2009; 48(2): 162 - 176.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc SciHome page
J. Robison, R. Fortinsky, A. Kleppinger, N. Shugrue, and M. Porter
A Broader View of Family Caregiving: Effects of Caregiving and Caregiver Conditions on Depressive Symptoms, Health, Work, and Social Isolation
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, November 1, 2009; 64B(6): 788 - 798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
D. R. Petrolia and S. Bhattacharjee
Revisiting Incentive Effects: Evidence from a Random-Sample Mail Survey on Consumer Preferences for Fuel Ethanol
Public Opin Q, September 1, 2009; 73(3): 537 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
P. S. Van Horn, K. E. Green, and M. Martinussen
Survey Response Rates and Survey Administration in Counseling and Clinical Psychology: A Meta-Analysis
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2009; 69(3): 389 - 403.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
M. Galesic and M. Bosnjak
Effects of Questionnaire Length on Participation and Indicators of Response Quality in a Web Survey
Public Opin Q, June 1, 2009; 73(2): 349 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
cfpHome page
I. Grava-Gubins and S. Scott
Effects of various methodologic strategies: Survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training
Can Fam Physician, October 1, 2008; 54(10): 1424 - 1430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Field MethodsHome page
T.-H. Shih and Xitao Fan
Comparing Response Rates from Web and Mail Surveys: A Meta-Analysis
Field Methods, August 1, 2008; 20(3): 249 - 271.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
J. B. VanGeest, T. P. Johnson, and V. L. Welch
Methodologies for Improving Response Rates in Surveys of Physicians: A Systematic Review
Eval Health Prof, December 1, 2007; 30(4): 303 - 321.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
S. R. Porter and M. E. Whitcomb
Mixed-Mode Contacts In Web Surveys: Paper is Not Necessarily Better
Public Opin Q, December 1, 2007; 71(4): 635 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
J. Blair, T. K. Taylor, and D. Johnson-Shelton
The Implications of Bank-Issued Check Surveys for Evaluators: A Case Study
American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2007; 28(3): 348 - 355.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
B. Marcus, M. Bosnjak, S. Lindner, S. Pilischenko, and A. Schutz
Compensating for Low Topic Interest and Long Surveys: A Field Experiment on Nonresponse in Web Surveys
Social Science Computer Review, August 1, 2007; 25(3): 372 - 383.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
S. G. Rogelberg and J. M. Stanton
Introduction: Understanding and Dealing With Organizational Survey Nonresponse
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2007; 10(2): 195 - 209.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
D. S. Rose, S. D. Sidle, and K. H. Griffith
A Penny for Your Thoughts: Monetary Incentives Improve Response Rates for Company-Sponsored Employee Surveys
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2007; 10(2): 225 - 240.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
H. Roose, J. Lievens, and H. Waege
The Joint Effect of Topic Interest and Follow-Up Procedures on the Response in a Mail Questionnaire: An Empirical Test of the Leverage-Saliency Theory in Audience Research
Sociological Methods Research, February 1, 2007; 35(3): 410 - 428.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
C. S. Cycyota and D. A. Harrison
What (Not) to Expect When Surveying Executives: A Meta-Analysis of Top Manager Response Rates and Techniques Over Time
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2006; 9(2): 133 - 160.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Youth Violence and Juvenile JusticeHome page
J. W. Patchin and S. Hinduja
Bullies Move Beyond the Schoolyard: A Preliminary Look at Cyberbullying
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, April 1, 2006; 4(2): 148 - 169.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
West J Nurs ResHome page
C. A. Hill, K. Fahrney, S. C. Wheeless, and C. P. Carson
Survey Response Inducements for Registered Nurses
West J Nurs Res, April 1, 2006; 28(3): 322 - 334.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
F. D. Perlmutter, J. R. Deckop, A. M. Konrad, and J. L. Freely
Nonprofits and the Job Retention of Former Welfare Clients
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, December 1, 2005; 34(4): 473 - 490.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
P. Edwards, R. Cooper, I. Roberts, and C. Frost
Meta-analysis of randomised trials of monetary incentives and response to mailed questionnaires
J Epidemiol Community Health, November 1, 2005; 59(11): 987 - 999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
E. White, P. A. Carney, and A. S. Kolar
Increasing Response to Mailed Questionnaires by Including a Pencil/Pen
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2005; 162(3): 261 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Behavioral DevelopmentHome page
L. R. Miller-Lewis, T. D. Wade, and C. Lee
Risk factors for pregnancy and childbearing in single young women: Evidence from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health
International Journal of Behavioral Development, July 1, 2005; 29(4): 292 - 303.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
N. Trussell and P. J. Lavrakas
The Influence of Incremental Increases in Token Cash Incentives on Mail Survey Response: Is There an Optimal Amount?
Public Opin Q, September 1, 2004; 68(3): 349 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
A. R. Trouteaud
How You Ask Counts: A Test of Internet-Related Components of Response Rates to a Web-Based Survey
Social Science Computer Review, August 1, 2004; 22(3): 385 - 392.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Journal of Early AdolescenceHome page
K. Ladin L'Engle, C. J. Pardun, and J. D. Brown
Accessing Adolescents: A School-Recruited, Home-Based Approach to Conducting Media and Health Research
The Journal of Early Adolescence, May 1, 2004; 24(2): 144 - 158.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
J.-F. Etter, M. Cucherat, and T. V. Perneger
Questionnaire Color and Response Rates to Mailed Surveys: A Randomizedtrial Anda Meta-Analysis
Eval Health Prof, June 1, 2002; 25(2): 185 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
C. S. Cycyota and D. A. Harrison
Enhancing Survey Response Rates at the Executive Level: Are Employee- or Consumer-Level Techniques Effective?
Journal of Management, April 1, 2002; 28(2): 151 - 176.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
S. J. Sills and C. Song
Innovations in Survey Research: An Application of Web-Based Surveys
Social Science Computer Review, February 1, 2002; 20(1): 22 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. S. Tworoger, Y. Yasui, C. M. Ulrich, H. Nakamura, K. LaCroix, R. Johnston, and A. McTiernan
Mailing Strategies and Recruitment into an Intervention Trial of the Exercise Effect on Breast Cancer Biomarkers
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2002; 11(1): 73 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
Z. Simsek and J. F. Veiga
A Primer on Internet Organizational Surveys
Organizational Research Methods, July 1, 2001; 4(3): 218 - 235.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
D. Kasprzyk, D. E. Montano, J. S. St. Lawrence, and W. R. Phillips
The Effects of Variations in Mode of Delivery and Monetary Incentive on Physicians' Responses to a Mailed Survey Assessing STD Practice Patterns
Eval Health Prof, March 1, 2001; 24(1): 3 - 17.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
G. Baron, P. De Wals, and F. Milord
Cost-Effectiveness of a Lottery for Increasing Physicians' Responses to a Mail Survey
Eval Health Prof, March 1, 2001; 24(1): 47 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
S. G. Rogelberg, G. G. Fisher, D. C. Maynard, M. D. Hakel, and M. Horvath
Attitudes toward Surveys: Development of a Measure and Its Relationship to Respondent Behavior
Organizational Research Methods, January 1, 2001; 4(1): 3 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
N. Gupta, J. D. Shaw, and J. E. Delery
Correlates of Response Outcomes among Organizational Key Informants
Organizational Research Methods, October 1, 2000; 3(4): 323 - 347.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
Z. Simsek and J. F. Veiga
The Electronic Survey Technique: An Integration and Assessment
Organizational Research Methods, January 1, 2000; 3(1): 93 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Current SociologyHome page
Bibliography
Current Sociology, October 1, 1998; 46(4): 119 - 135.



Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
P. L. Roth and C. A. BeVier
Response Rates in HRM/OB Survey Research: Norms and Correlates, 1990-1994
Journal of Management, February 1, 1998; 24(1): 97 - 117.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
A. N. Easton, J. H. Price, K. Boehm, and S. K. Telljohann
Sun Protection Counseling by Pediatricians
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, November 1, 1997; 151(11): 1133 - 1138.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
S. A. Everett, J. H. Price, A. W. Bedell, and S. K. Telljohann
The Effect of a Monetary Incentive in Increasing the Return Rate of a Survey to Family Physicians
Eval Health Prof, June 1, 1997; 20(2): 207 - 214.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of SociologyHome page
R. Axford, B. Carter, and G. Grunwald
Enhancing Dillman's total design method for mailed/ telephone surveys using current technology to maximise cost-benefit ratios
Journal of Sociology, January 1, 1997; 33(3): 387 - 393.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
N. A. Day, D. R. Dunt, and S. Day
Maximizing Response to Surveys in Health Program Evaluation At Minimum Cost Using Multiple Methods: Mail, Telephone, and Visit
Eval Rev, August 1, 1995; 19(4): 436 - 450.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
J. C. Sherblom, C. F. Sullivan, and E. C. Sherblom
The What, the Whom, and the Hows of Survey Research
Business Communication Quarterly, December 1, 1993; 56(4): 58 - 64.
[PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.