Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Summary
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (153)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CHURCH, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Public Opinion Quarterly 57:62-79 (1993)
© 1993 American Association for Public Opinion Research

ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF INCENTIVES ON MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATES: A META-ANALYSIS

ALLAN H. CHURCH, Ph.D., candidate in organizational psychology

Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University

This article reports the results of a meta-analysis of 38 experimental and quasi-experimental studies that implemented some form of mail survey incentive in order to increase response rates. A total of 74 observations or cases were classified into one of four types of incentive groups: those using prepaid monetary or nonmonetary rewards included with the initial survey mailing and those using monetary or nonmonetary rewards as conditional upon the return of the survey. Results were generated using an analysis of variance approach. The overall effect size across the 74 observations was reported as low to moderate at d=.241. When compared across incentive types, only those surveys that included rewards (both monetary and nonmonetary) in the initial mailing yielded statistically significant estimates of effect size (d=.347, d=.136). The average increase in response rates over control conditions for these types of incentives was 19.1 percent and 7.9 percent, respectively. There was no evidence of any impact for those incentive types offering rewards contingent upon the return of the survey.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
J. J. Blanchard, L. M. Collins, M. Aghevli, W. W. Leung, and A. S. Cohen
Social Anhedonia and Schizotypy in a Community Sample: The Maryland Longitudinal Study of Schizotypy
Schizophr Bull, October 22, 2009; (2009) sbp107v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
D. R. Petrolia and S. Bhattacharjee
Revisiting Incentive Effects: Evidence from a Random-Sample Mail Survey on Consumer Preferences for Fuel Ethanol
Public Opin Q, September 1, 2009; 73(3): 537 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
P. S. Van Horn, K. E. Green, and M. Martinussen
Survey Response Rates and Survey Administration in Counseling and Clinical Psychology: A Meta-Analysis
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2009; 69(3): 389 - 403.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
M. Brennan and J. Charbonneau
Improving Mail Survey Response Rates Using Chocolate and Replacement Questionnaires
Public Opin Q, June 1, 2009; 73(2): 368 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Public Opin ResHome page
P. Gendall and B. Healey
Alternatives to Prepaid Monetary Incentives in Mail Surveys
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., December 1, 2008; 20(4): 517 - 527.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Public Opin ResHome page
W. Wetzels, H. Schmeets, J. v. d. Brakel, and R. Feskens
Impact of Prepaid Incentives in Face-to-Face Surveys: A Large-Scale Experiment with Postage Stamps
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., December 1, 2008; 20(4): 507 - 516.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav Res MethodsHome page
A. S. GORITZ, H.-G. WOLFF, and D. G. GOLDSTEIN
Individual payments as a longer-term incentive in online panels
Behav Res Methods, November 1, 2008; 40(4): 1144 - 1149.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
cfpHome page
I. Grava-Gubins and S. Scott
Effects of various methodologic strategies: Survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training
Can Fam Physician, October 1, 2008; 54(10): 1424 - 1430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
S. L. Mann, D. J. Lynn, and A. V. Peterson Jr
The "Downstream" Effect of Token Prepaid Cash Incentives to Parents on Their Young Adult Children's Survey Participation
Public Opin Q, September 1, 2008; 72(3): 487 - 501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
J. L. Zagorsky and P. Rhoton
The Effects of Promised Monetary Incentives on Attrition in a Long-Term Panel Survey
Public Opin Q, September 1, 2008; 72(3): 502 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Field MethodsHome page
A. S. Goritz
The Long-Term Effect of Material Incentives on Participation in Online Panels
Field Methods, August 1, 2008; 20(3): 211 - 225.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Field MethodsHome page
T.-H. Shih and Xitao Fan
Comparing Response Rates from Web and Mail Surveys: A Meta-Analysis
Field Methods, August 1, 2008; 20(3): 249 - 271.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
P. Kemper, B. Heier, T. Barry, D. Brannon, J. Angelelli, J. Vasey, and M. Anderson-Knott
What Do Direct Care Workers Say Would Improve Their Jobs? Differences Across Settings
Gerontologist, July 1, 2008; 48(suppl_1): 17 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
M. Bosnjak, W. Neubarth, M. P. Couper, W. Bandilla, and L. Kaczmirek
Prenotification in Web-Based Access Panel Surveys: The Influence of Mobile Text Messaging Versus E-Mail on Response Rates and Sample Composition
Social Science Computer Review, May 1, 2008; 26(2): 213 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
J. B. VanGeest, T. P. Johnson, and V. L. Welch
Methodologies for Improving Response Rates in Surveys of Physicians: A Systematic Review
Eval Health Prof, December 1, 2007; 30(4): 303 - 321.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
S. R. Porter and M. E. Whitcomb
Mixed-Mode Contacts In Web Surveys: Paper is Not Necessarily Better
Public Opin Q, December 1, 2007; 71(4): 635 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
B. Marcus, M. Bosnjak, S. Lindner, S. Pilischenko, and A. Schutz
Compensating for Low Topic Interest and Long Surveys: A Field Experiment on Nonresponse in Web Surveys
Social Science Computer Review, August 1, 2007; 25(3): 372 - 383.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
D. S. Rose, S. D. Sidle, and K. H. Griffith
A Penny for Your Thoughts: Monetary Incentives Improve Response Rates for Company-Sponsored Employee Surveys
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2007; 10(2): 225 - 240.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
H. Roose, J. Lievens, and H. Waege
The Joint Effect of Topic Interest and Follow-Up Procedures on the Response in a Mail Questionnaire: An Empirical Test of the Leverage-Saliency Theory in Audience Research
Sociological Methods Research, February 1, 2007; 35(3): 410 - 428.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
A. S. Goritz
Cash Lotteries as Incentives in Online Panels
Social Science Computer Review, November 1, 2006; 24(4): 445 - 459.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
K. L. Fridkin, P. J. Kenney, and J. Crittenden
On the Margins of Democratic Life: The Impact of Race and Ethnicity on the Political Engagement of Young People
American Politics Research, September 1, 2006; 34(5): 605 - 626.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Public Opin ResHome page
M. F. Teisl, B. Roe, and M. E. Vayda
Incentive Effects on Response Rates, Data Quality, and Survey Administration Costs
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., September 1, 2006; 18(3): 364 - 373.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Field MethodsHome page
D. Heerwegh
An Investigation of the Effect of Lotteries on Web Survey Response Rates
Field Methods, May 1, 2006; 18(2): 205 - 220.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
C. S. Cycyota and D. A. Harrison
What (Not) to Expect When Surveying Executives: A Meta-Analysis of Top Manager Response Rates and Techniques Over Time
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2006; 9(2): 133 - 160.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Public Opin ResHome page
E. Ryu, M. P. Couper, and R. W. Marans
Survey Incentives: Cash vs. In-Kind; Face-to-Face vs. Mail; Response Rate vs. Nonresponse Error
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., March 1, 2006; 18(1): 89 - 106.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
M. E. Kropf and J. Blair
Eliciting Survey Cooperation: Incentives, Self-Interest, and Norms of Cooperation
Eval Rev, December 1, 2005; 29(6): 559 - 575.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
P. Edwards, R. Cooper, I. Roberts, and C. Frost
Meta-analysis of randomised trials of monetary incentives and response to mailed questionnaires
J Epidemiol Community Health, November 1, 2005; 59(11): 987 - 999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
E. White, P. A. Carney, and A. S. Kolar
Increasing Response to Mailed Questionnaires by Including a Pencil/Pen
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2005; 162(3): 261 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
A. Diekmann
The Power of Reciprocity: Fairness, Reciprocity, and Stakes in Variants of the Dictator Game
Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2004; 48(4): 487 - 505.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
J. P. Birnholtz, D. B. Horn, T. A. Finholt, and S. J. Bae
The Effects of Cash, Electronic, and Paper Gift Certificates as Respondent Incentives for a Web-Based Survey of Technologically Sophisticated Respondents
Social Science Computer Review, August 1, 2004; 22(3): 355 - 362.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
T. L. Tuten, M. Galesic, and M. Bosnjak
Effects of Immediate Versus Delayed Notification of Prize Draw Results on Response Behavior in Web Surveys: An Experiment
Social Science Computer Review, August 1, 2004; 22(3): 377 - 384.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Journal of Early AdolescenceHome page
K. Ladin L'Engle, C. J. Pardun, and J. D. Brown
Accessing Adolescents: A School-Recruited, Home-Based Approach to Conducting Media and Health Research
The Journal of Early Adolescence, May 1, 2004; 24(2): 144 - 158.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
M. A. Hager, S. Wilson, T. H. Pollak, and P. M. Rooney
Response Rates for Mail Surveys of Nonprofit Organizations: A Review and Empirical Test
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, June 1, 2003; 32(2): 252 - 267.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
M. Bosnjak and T. L. Tuten
Prepaid and Promised Incentives in Web Surveys: An Experiment
Social Science Computer Review, May 1, 2003; 21(2): 208 - 217.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. M. Doody, A. S. Sigurdson, D. Kampa, K. Chimes, B. H. Alexander, E. Ron, R. E. Tarone, and M. S. Linet
Randomized Trial of Financial Incentives and Delivery Methods for Improving Response to a Mailed Questionnaire
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2003; 157(7): 643 - 651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
J.-F. Etter, M. Cucherat, and T. V. Perneger
Questionnaire Color and Response Rates to Mailed Surveys: A Randomizedtrial Anda Meta-Analysis
Eval Health Prof, June 1, 2002; 25(2): 185 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
C. S. Cycyota and D. A. Harrison
Enhancing Survey Response Rates at the Executive Level: Are Employee- or Consumer-Level Techniques Effective?
Journal of Management, April 1, 2002; 28(2): 151 - 176.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
Z. Simsek and J. F. Veiga
A Primer on Internet Organizational Surveys
Organizational Research Methods, July 1, 2001; 4(3): 218 - 235.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
D. Kasprzyk, D. E. Montano, J. S. St. Lawrence, and W. R. Phillips
The Effects of Variations in Mode of Delivery and Monetary Incentive on Physicians' Responses to a Mailed Survey Assessing STD Practice Patterns
Eval Health Prof, March 1, 2001; 24(1): 3 - 17.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
G. Baron, P. De Wals, and F. Milord
Cost-Effectiveness of a Lottery for Increasing Physicians' Responses to a Mail Survey
Eval Health Prof, March 1, 2001; 24(1): 47 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
J. H. Price, J. A. Dake, and R. Islam
Selected Ethical Issues in Research and Publication: Perceptions of Health Education Faculty
Health Educ Behav, February 1, 2001; 28(1): 51 - 64.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
R. L. Collins, P. L. Ellickson, R. D. Hays, and D. F. Mccaffrey
Effects of Incentive Size and Timing on Response Rates to a Follow-Up Wave of a Longitudinal Mailed Survey
Eval Rev, August 1, 2000; 24(4): 347 - 363.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
Z. Simsek and J. F. Veiga
The Electronic Survey Technique: An Integration and Assessment
Organizational Research Methods, January 1, 2000; 3(1): 93 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
H. Cho and R. Larose
Privacy Issues in Internet Surveys
Social Science Computer Review, November 1, 1999; 17(4): 421 - 434.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Current SociologyHome page
Bibliography
Current Sociology, October 1, 1998; 46(4): 119 - 135.



Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
P. L. Roth and C. A. BeVier
Response Rates in HRM/OB Survey Research: Norms and Correlates, 1990-1994
Journal of Management, February 1, 1998; 24(1): 97 - 117.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
S. A. Everett, J. H. Price, A. W. Bedell, and S. K. Telljohann
The Effect of a Monetary Incentive in Increasing the Return Rate of a Survey to Family Physicians
Eval Health Prof, June 1, 1997; 20(2): 207 - 214.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.