Public Opinion Quarterly 65:157-177 (2001)
© 2001 American Association for Public Opinion Research
Articles |
Tracking Issue Attention: Specifying the Dynamics of the Public Agenda*
Abstract
While interest in issues shifts daily, tracking these changes is currently done by multiple surveys, which are conducted months apart. In this article, we adapt political tracking poll methods to model the functional form of issue attention changes through three phases, including equilibrium, developing interest, and decline. We find that opinions do follow discernible cycles. Further, we test and find strong support for the "boredom" explanation that reactions to external events that are brought to the attention of the public through the media are much greater during the developing interest phase than the saturation phase. The evidence gathered from the newly adapted method has implications for modeling the issue-attention cycle and testing the effects of media coverage and external events on public interest in issues.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. J. Stroud and K. Kenski From Agenda Setting to Refusal Setting: Survey Nonresponse as a Function of Media Coverage Across the 2004 Election Cycle Public Opin Q, December 1, 2007; 71(4): 539 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. J. Son and D. H. Weaver Another Look at What Moves Public Opinion: Media Agenda Setting and Polls in the 2000 U.S. Election Int. J. Public Opin. Res., June 1, 2006; 18(2): 174 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Newig Public Attention, Political Action: the Example of Environmental Regulation Rationality and Society, May 1, 2004; 16(2): 149 - 190. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. T. Henry and M. M. Mark Beyond Use: Understanding Evaluation's Influence on Attitudes and Actions American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2003; 24(3): 293 - 314. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||



