Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BAUM, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by KERNELL, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Public Opinion Quarterly 65:198-229 (2001)
© 2001 American Association for Public Opinion Research


Articles

Economic Class and Popular Support for Franklin Roosevelt in War and Peace*

MATTHEW A. BAUM and SAMUEL KERNELL

Abstract

History has judged FDR as one of America's greatest leaders in part because he maintained the public's confidence in seeing the nation through the travails of the Depression and World War II. During this era, the two most widely employed explanatory variables in contemporary presidential popularity scholarship—assumed their most extreme values of the twentieth century. Hence, not only is understanding Roosevelt's public support historically important, but it represents a valuable case for filling in our understanding of the opinion dynamics of presidential support more generally. Yet, surprisingly, Roosevelt's approval ratings have attracted little systematic scrutiny. Compiling time-series data from 1937 to 1943, partially disaggregated by economic class, we investigate FDR's popular support among different classes during both national crises. We find that Roosevelt's peacetime support divided along class lines, while during the war class divisions blurred. Roosevelt's support was indeed conditioned by external events, refracted through the interests of different societal groups. We conclude that public support for modern presidents should be similarly studied as the sum of opinions among heterogeneous constituencies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
A. J. Berinsky
American Public Opinion in the 1930s and 1940s: The Analysis of Quota-Controlled Sample Survey Data
Public Opin Q, December 1, 2006; 70(4): 499 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
D. L. Kriner
Examining Variance in Presidential Approval: The Case of FDR in World War II
Public Opin Q, March 1, 2006; 70(1): 23 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
M. Koch and S. S. Gartner
Casualties and Constituencies: Democratic Accountability, Electoral Institutions, and Costly Conflicts
Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 2005; 49(6): 874 - 894.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
M. A. Baum
Going Private: Public Opinion, Presidential Rhetoric, and the Domestic Politics of Audience Costs in U.S. Foreign Policy Crises
Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 2004; 48(5): 603 - 631.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
P. Gronke and B. Newman
FDR to Clinton, Mueller to?: A Field Essay on Presidential Approval
Political Research Quarterly, December 1, 2003; 56(4): 501 - 512.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
B. Newman
Bill Clinton's Approval Ratings: The More Things Change, The More They Stay the Same
Political Research Quarterly, December 1, 2002; 55(4): 781 - 804.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.