Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LOMAX COOK, F.
Right arrow Articles by PAGE, B. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Public Opinion Quarterly 66:235-264 (2002)
© 2002 American Association for Public Opinion Research

Articles

Invoking Public Opinion: Policy Elites and Social Security*

FAY LOMAX COOK, JASON BARABAS and BENJAMIN I. PAGE

Abstract

Do policy elites invoke public opinion? When they do, are their claims based on evidence from public opinion surveys? To learn about the claims that policy elites make, we examined statements the president and members of Congress, experts, and interest group leaders in congressional hearings made about Social Security. To learn about opinion data on Social Security, we conducted a Lexis-Nexis search of the archives of the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research. Our analyses show that policy elites discussing Social Security did invoke public opinion. Contrary to our expectations, however, few of the elite invocations of public opinion cited specific surveys or concrete facts about the distribution of opinion. Although claims directly contradicting survey evidence were relatively rare, only with the rather few specific claims by congressional elites did we find much clear-cut support in the available polling data. Relatively seldom could we find clear-cut support for the elites' general claims. Moreover, some of the most frequent claims about public opinion—could have been contested but seldom were. The highly visible and well-polled case of Social Security suggests that specific, data-based elite invocations of public opinion may be even less common on other, lower-visibility and less-polled issues. It also suggests that survey research professionals might do well to intensify their scrutiny of public discourse about public opinion and to increase their efforts to bring scientific expertise to bear upon such discourse.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.Home page
J. Svihula and C. L. Estes
Social Security Politics: Ideology and Reform
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., March 1, 2007; 62(2): S79 - S89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Review of Radical Political EconomicsHome page
D. V. Orr
The Rhetoric of the Social Security Debate
Review of Radical Political Economics, September 1, 2006; 38(3): 327 - 333.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 American Politics ResearchHome page
C. Paden and B. I. Page
Congress Invokes Public Opinion on Welfare Reform
American Politics Research, November 1, 2003; 31(6): 670 - 679.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.