Public Opinion Quarterly 66:371-403 (2002)
© 2002 American Association for Public Opinion Research
Articles |
The Impact of "No Opinion" Response Options on Data Quality: Non-Attitude Reduction or an Invitation to Satisfice?*
Abstract
According to many seasoned survey researchers, offering a no-opinion option should reduce the pressure to give substantive responses felt by respondents who have no true opinions. By contrast, the survey satisficing perspective suggests that no-opinion options may discourage some respondents from doing the cognitive work necessary to report the true opinions they do have. We address these arguments using data from nine experiments carried out in three household surveys. Attraction to no-opinion options was found to be greatest among respondents lowest in cognitive skills (as measured by educational attainment), among respondents answering secretly instead of orally, for questions asked later in a survey, and among respondents who devoted little effort to the reporting process. The quality of attitude reports obtained (as measured by over-time consistency and responsiveness to a question manipulation) was not compromised by the omission of no-opinion options. These results suggest that inclusion of no-opinion options in attitude measures may not enhance data quality and instead may preclude measurement of some meaningful opinions.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Dull Results-Model Reform Leadership: Questions of Credible Commitment J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., March 5, 2008; (2008) mum043v3. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Kibble Use of unsupervised online quizzes as formative assessment in a medical physiology course: effects of incentives on student participation and performance Advan Physiol Educ, September 1, 2007; 31(3): 253 - 260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. L. Holbrook, J. A. Krosnick, D. Moore, and R. Tourangeau Response Order Effects in Dichotomous Categorical Questions Presented Orally: The Impact of Question and Respondent Attributes Public Opin Q, September 1, 2007; 71(3): 325 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Heerwegh and G. Loosveldt Personalizing E-mail Contacts: Its Influence on Web Survey Response Rate and Social Desirability Response Bias Int. J. Public Opin. Res., June 1, 2007; 19(2): 258 - 268. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. M. Shaeffer, J. A. Krosnick, G. E. Langer, and D. M. Merkle Comparing the Quality of Data Obtained by Minimally Balanced and Fully Balanced Attitude Questions Public Opin Q, September 1, 2005; 69(3): 417 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Sturgis, C. Roberts, and N. Allum A Different Take on the Deliberative Poll: Information, Deliberation, and Attitude Constraint Public Opin Q, March 1, 2005; 69(1): 30 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J Hagelin, T Nilstun, J Hau, and H-E Carlsson Surveys on attitudes towards legalisation of euthanasia: importance of question phrasing J. Med. Ethics, December 1, 2004; 30(6): 521 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|