Skip Navigation

Public Opinion Quarterly 2004 68(1):2-31; doi:10.1093/poq/nfh002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (55)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Groves, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dipko, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 68 No. 1 Pp. 2–31, © American Association for Public Opinion Research 2004; all rights reserved

The Role of Topic Interest in Survey Participation Decisions

Robert M. Groves, Stanley Presser and Sarah Dipko

Robert M. Groves is at the University of Michigan and the Joint Program in Survey Methodology (JPSM). Stanley Presser and Sarah Dipko are at the University of Maryland and the JPSM. The authors thank the interagency advisory committee for the 2000 Joint Program in Survey Methodology practicum (B. K. Atrostic, Susan Schecter, and Clyde Tucker), the JPSM students in the practicum, Steve Heeringa, Roger Tourangeau, Sonja Ziniel, and two anonymous reviewers, all of whom were helpful in preparing the article.

Address correspondence to Robert M. Groves (email: bgroves{at}isr.umich.edu) or Stanley Presser (e-mail: spresser{at}survey.umd.edu).

While a low survey response rate may indicate that the risk of nonresponse error is high, we know little about when nonresponse causes such error and when nonresponse is ignorable. Leverage-salience theory of survey participation suggests that when the survey topic is a factor in the decision to participate, noncooperation will cause nonresponse error. We test three hypotheses derived from the theory: (1) those faced with a survey request on a topic of interest to them cooperate at higher rates than do those less interested in the topic; (2) this tendency for the "interested" to cooperate more readily is diminished when monetary incentives are offered; and (3) the impact of interest on cooperation has nonignorability implications for key statistics. The data come from a three-factor experiment examining the impact on cooperation with surveys on (a) five different topics, using (b) samples from five different populations that have known attributes related to the topics, with (c) two different incentive conditions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eval RevHome page
C. Greenlaw and S. Brown-Welty
A Comparison of Web-Based and Paper-Based Survey Methods: Testing Assumptions of Survey Mode and Response Cost
Eval Rev, October 1, 2009; 33(5): 464 - 480.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
A. Peytchev, R. K. Baxter, and L. R. Carley-Baxter
Not All Survey Effort is Equal: Reduction of Nonresponse Bias and Nonresponse Error
Public Opin Q, September 2, 2009; (2009) nfp037v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
D. R. Petrolia and S. Bhattacharjee
Revisiting Incentive Effects: Evidence from a Random-Sample Mail Survey on Consumer Preferences for Fuel Ethanol
Public Opin Q, September 1, 2009; 73(3): 537 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
cfpHome page
W. L. Parsons, P. S. Duke, P. Snow, and A. Edwards
Physicians as parents: Parenting experiences of physicians in Newfoundland and Labrador
Can Fam Physician, August 1, 2009; 55(8): 808 - 809.e4.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
M. W. Courser, S. R. Shamblen, P. J. Lavrakas, D. Collins, and P. Ditterline
The Impact of Active Consent Procedures on Nonresponse and Nonresponse Error in Youth Survey Data: Evidence From a New Experiment
Eval Rev, August 1, 2009; 33(4): 370 - 395.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
J. L. Holland and L. M. Christian
The Influence of Topic Interest and Interactive Probing on Responses to Open-Ended Questions in Web Surveys
Social Science Computer Review, May 1, 2009; 27(2): 196 - 212.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
R. K. Goidel, C. M. Freeman, S. Procopio, and C. F. Zewe
Who Participates in the "Public Square" and Does It Matter?
Public Opin Q, December 1, 2008; 72(4): 792 - 803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
M. Kano, T. Franke, A. A. Afifi, and L. B. Bourque
Adequacy of Reporting Results of School Surveys and Nonresponse Effects: A Review of the Literature and a Case Study
Educational Researcher, November 1, 2008; 37(8): 480 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
C. A. Klofstad, S. Boulianne, and D. Basson
Matching the Message to the Medium: Results from an Experiment on Internet Survey Email Contacts
Social Science Computer Review, November 1, 2008; 26(4): 498 - 509.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
S. L. Mann, D. J. Lynn, and A. V. Peterson Jr
The "Downstream" Effect of Token Prepaid Cash Incentives to Parents on Their Young Adult Children's Survey Participation
Public Opin Q, September 1, 2008; 72(3): 487 - 501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
J. M. Mellor, R. B. Rapoport, and D. Maliniak
The Impact of Child Obesity on Active Parental Consent in School-Based Survey Research on Healthy Eating and Physical Activity
Eval Rev, June 1, 2008; 32(3): 298 - 312.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
R. M. Groves and E. Peytcheva
The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias: A Meta-Analysis
Public Opin Q, June 1, 2008; 72(2): 167 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
M. Bosnjak, W. Neubarth, M. P. Couper, W. Bandilla, and L. Kaczmirek
Prenotification in Web-Based Access Panel Surveys: The Influence of Mobile Text Messaging Versus E-Mail on Response Rates and Sample Composition
Social Science Computer Review, May 1, 2008; 26(2): 213 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Public Opin ResHome page
R. Bautista, M. Callegaro, J. A. Vera, and F. Abundis
Studying Nonresponse in Mexican Exit Polls
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., December 1, 2007; 19(4): 492 - 503.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
N. J. Stroud and K. Kenski
From Agenda Setting to Refusal Setting: Survey Nonresponse as a Function of Media Coverage Across the 2004 Election Cycle
Public Opin Q, December 1, 2007; 71(4): 539 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
S. G. Rogelberg and J. M. Stanton
Introduction: Understanding and Dealing With Organizational Survey Nonresponse
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2007; 10(2): 195 - 209.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
H. Roose, J. Lievens, and H. Waege
The Joint Effect of Topic Interest and Follow-Up Procedures on the Response in a Mail Questionnaire: An Empirical Test of the Leverage-Saliency Theory in Audience Research
Sociological Methods Research, February 1, 2007; 35(3): 410 - 428.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. M. Horwitz, K. J. Kelleher, R. E.K. Stein, A. Storfer-Isser, E. A. Youngstrom, E. R. Park, A. M. Heneghan, P. S. Jensen, K. G. O'Connor, and K. E. Hoagwood
Barriers to the Identification and Management of Psychosocial Issues in Children and Maternal Depression
Pediatrics, January 1, 2007; 119(1): e208 - e218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
A. L. Holbrook, I. C. Farrar, and S. J. Popkin
Surveying a Chicago Public Housing Development: Methodological Challenges and Lessons Learned
Eval Rev, December 1, 2006; 30(6): 779 - 802.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
H. Schuman and A. D. Corning
Comparing Iraq to Vietnam: Recognition, Recall, and the Nature of Cohort Effects
Public Opin Q, March 1, 2006; 70(1): 78 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
E. Singer
Introduction: Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys
Public Opin Q, January 1, 2006; 70(5): 637 - 645.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
R. M. Groves
Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys
Public Opin Q, January 1, 2006; 70(5): 646 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
T. P. Johnson, Y. I. Cho, R. T. Campbell, and A. L. Holbrook
Using Community-Level Correlates to Evaluate Nonresponse Effects in a Telephone Survey
Public Opin Q, January 1, 2006; 70(5): 704 - 719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
R. M. Groves, M. P. Couper, S. Presser, E. Singer, R. Tourangeau, G. P. Acosta, and L. Nelson
Experiments in Producing Nonresponse Bias
Public Opin Q, January 1, 2006; 70(5): 720 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
K. Olson
Survey Participation, Nonresponse Bias, Measurement Error Bias, and Total Bias
Public Opin Q, January 1, 2006; 70(5): 737 - 758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
S. Keeter, C. Kennedy, M. Dimock, J. Best, and P. Craighill
Gauging the Impact of Growing Nonresponse on Estimates from a National RDD Telephone Survey
Public Opin Q, January 1, 2006; 70(5): 759 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
J. M. Brick, S. Dipko, S. Presser, C. Tucker, and Y. Yuan
Nonresponse Bias in a Dual Frame Sample of Cell and Landline Numbers
Public Opin Q, January 1, 2006; 70(5): 780 - 793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
C. B. Mann
Do Advance Letters Improve Preelection Forecast Accuracy?
Public Opin Q, December 1, 2005; 69(4): 561 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
R. Curtin, S. Presser, and E. Singer
Changes in Telephone Survey Nonresponse over the Past Quarter Century
Public Opin Q, March 1, 2005; 69(1): 87 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.