Skip Navigation

Public Opinion Quarterly 2005 69(1):66-86; doi:10.1093/poq/nfi010
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plutzer, E.
Right arrow Articles by Berkman, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org.

The Graying of America and Support for Funding the Nation’s Schools

Eric Plutzer and Michael Berkman

ERIC PLUTZER is an associate professor of political science and sociology at the Pennsylvania state University. MICHAEL BERKMAN is an associate professor of political science at the Pennsylavania State University. This research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (SES 03–50541).

Address correspondence to Eric Plutzer; e-mail: plutzer{at}psu.edu.

Surveys spanning more than 35 years show that older Americans are less likely than younger citizens to endorse increased spending on public schools. The conventional explanation for this generational cleavage presumes that citizens’ interests change as they approach or transition into retirement—the absence of school-age children and fixed incomes combine to lower their interest in supporting spending increases for public education. We show that the conventional wisdom is incorrect, based on a confusion of age and cohort effects. Cohort-period analysis shows that every cohort becomes more supportive of educational spending, rather than less, as they reach their 60s and 70s. The implications are important, for they suggest that the predicted "gray peril" to educational spending will not occur. Rather, our results suggest that public support for educational spending will continue its remarkable rise.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational PolicyHome page
V. A. Bali
The Passage of Education Citizen Initiatives: Evidence From California
Educational Policy, May 1, 2008; 22(3): 422 - 456.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.