Skip Navigation

Public Opinion Quarterly 2005 69(1):99-112; doi:10.1093/poq/nfi004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hurwitz, J.
Right arrow Articles by Peffley, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org.

Playing the Race Card in the Post–Willie Horton Era

The Impact of Racialized Code Words on Support for Punitive Crime Policy

Jon Hurwitz

University of Pittsburgh

Mark Peffley

University of Kentucky

Address correspondence to Mark Peffley; e-mail: mpeffl{at}uky.edu.

To date, little is known about the precise impact of racially coded words and phrases. Instead, most of what we know about racialized messages comes from studies that focus on pictorial racial cues (for example, the infamous "Willie Horton" ad) or on messages with an extensive textual narrative that is laced with implicit racial cues. Because in a "post-Horton" era strategic use of racially coded words will often be far more subtle than those explored in past studies, we investigate the power of a single phrase believed by many to carry strong racial connotations: "inner city." We do so by embedding an experiment in a national survey of whites, where a random half of respondents was asked whether they support spending money for prisons (versus antipoverty programs) to lock up "violent criminals," while the other half was asked about "violent inner city criminals." Consistent with the literature on issue framing, we find that whites’ racial attitudes (for example, racial stereotypes) were much more important in shaping preferences for punitive policies when they receive the racially coded, "inner city" question. Our results demonstrate how easy it is to continue "playing the race card" in the post–Willie Horton era, as well as some of the limits of such framing effects among whites with more positive racial attitudes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Research in Crime and DelinquencyHome page
D. P. Mears, C. Mancini, and E. A. Stewart
Whites' Concern about Crime: The Effects of Interracial Contact
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, November 1, 2009; 46(4): 524 - 552.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theoretical CriminologyHome page
J. D. Unnever and F. T. Cullen
Empathetic identification and punitiveness: A middle-range theory of individual differences
Theoretical Criminology, August 1, 2009; 13(3): 283 - 312.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
S. Knobloch-Westerwick and L. D. Taylor
The Blame Game: Elements of Causal Attribution and its Impact on Siding with Agents in the News
Communication Research, December 1, 2008; 35(6): 723 - 744.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crit SociolHome page
P. F. Case
The Relationship of Race and Criminal Behavior: Challenging Cultural Explanations for a Structural Problem
Crit Sociol, March 1, 2008; 34(2): 213 - 238.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.