Skip Navigation

Public Opinion Quarterly 2005 69(3):370-392; doi:10.1093/poq/nfi027
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fricker, S.
Right arrow Articles by Yan, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org.

An Experimental Comparison of Web and Telephone Surveys

Scott Fricker, Mirta Galesic, Roger Tourangeau and Ting Yan

SCOTT FRICKER is a psychologist at the Bureau of Labor Statistics and a graduate student at the Joint Program in Survey Methodology, University of Maryland. ROGER TOURANGEAU is a research professor at the Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, and director of the Joint Program in Survey Methodology, University of Maryland. MIRTA GALESIC and TING YAN are graduate students at the Joint Program in Survey Methodology, University of Maryland. The work reported here was conducted as part of the Joint Program in Survey Methodology Practicum. We are grateful to Sarah Dipko, who helped direct the Practicum, to the students in that class, and to the National Science Foundation for its support of the study. We are especially grateful to Robert Bell and Jeri Mulrow at the National Science Foundation for their help in designing the study and to Frauke Kreuter and Carolina Casas-Cordero for their comments on an earlier draft of the paper. Finally, we thank Chintan Turakhia and Dean Williams at Schulman, Ronca, and Bucuvalas, Inc., for their direction of the study at SRBI. The authors contributed equally to the research and are listed in alphabetical order.

Address correspondence to Roger Tourangeau; e-mail: RTourang{at}survey.umd.edu.

We carried out an experiment that compared telephone and Web versions of a questionnaire that assessed attitudes toward science and knowledge of basic scientific facts. Members of a random digit dial (RDD) sample were initially contacted by telephone and answered a few screening questions, including one that asked whether they had Internet access. Those with Internet access were randomly assigned to complete either a Web version of the questionnaire or a computer-assisted telephone interview. There were four main findings. First, although we offered cases assigned to the Web survey a larger incentive, fewer of them completed the online questionnaire; almost all those who were assigned to the telephone condition completed the interview. The two samples of Web users nonetheless had similar demographic characteristics. Second, the Web survey produced less item nonresponse than the telephone survey. The Web questionnaire prompted respondents when they left an item blank, whereas the telephone interviewers accepted "no opinion" answers without probing them. Third, Web respondents gave less differentiated answers to batteries of attitude items than their telephone counterparts. The Web questionnaire presented these items in a grid that may have made their similarity more salient. Finally, Web respondents took longer to complete the knowledge items, particularly those requiring open-ended answers, than the telephone respondents, and Web respondents answered a higher percentage of them correctly. These differences between Web and telephone surveys probably reflect both inherent differences between the two modes and incidental features of our implementation of the survey. The mode differences also vary by item type and by respondent age.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and DevelopmentHome page
E. W. Wolfe, P. D. Converse, O. Airen, and N. Bodenhorn
Unit and Item Nonresponses and Ancillary Information in Web- and Paper-Based Questionnaires Administered to School Counselors
Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, July 1, 2009; 42(2): 92 - 103.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
J. L. Holland and L. M. Christian
The Influence of Topic Interest and Interactive Probing on Responses to Open-Ended Questions in Web Surveys
Social Science Computer Review, May 1, 2009; 27(2): 196 - 212.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
D. Heerwegh and G. Loosveldt
Face-to-Face versus Web Surveying in a High-Internet-Coverage Population: Differences in Response Quality
Public Opin Q, December 1, 2008; 72(5): 836 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
C. A. Klofstad, S. Boulianne, and D. Basson
Matching the Message to the Medium: Results from an Experiment on Internet Survey Email Contacts
Social Science Computer Review, November 1, 2008; 26(4): 498 - 509.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. Whitlock, J. Eckenrode, and D. Silverman
Self-injurious behaviors in a college population.
Pediatrics, June 1, 2006; 117(6): 1939 - 1948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.