Skip Navigation

Public Opinion Quarterly 2005 69(5):725-743; doi:10.1093/poq/nfi067
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, B. W.
Right arrow Articles by Jamieson, K. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Polling and the Media

Can a Poll Affect Perception of Candidate Traits?

Bruce W. Hardy and Kathleen Hall Jamieson

BRUCE W. HARDY is a doctoral student in the Annenberg School for Communication and a senior research analyst at the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania. KATHLEEN HALL JAMIESON is the Elizabeth Ware Packard Professor of Communication in the Annenberg School for Communication and the Walter and Leonore Annenberg Director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania.

Address correspondence to Bruce W. Hardy; e-mail: bhardy{at}asc.penn.edu.

During presidential elections, poll results frequently are presented in the news. Reporters use these polls to tell the public what it thinks about the presidential candidates. We argue that polling results tell the public what it should think about the presidential candidates as well. This study outlines how a character trait that is not usually used to assess presidential candidates was put into play during the 2004 presidential campaign. By repeatedly ascribing "stubbornness" to incumbent president George W. Bush, Democratic challenger John Kerry may have prompted this trait’s inclusion in a Los Angeles Times summer 2004 survey. The poll’s evidence that the public saw Bush as more stubborn than Kerry then produced an attribute agenda-setting effect that strengthened the link between that term and Bush. Using data from the National Annenberg Election Survey, we argue that the news coverage of this Los Angeles Times poll increased the salience of the trait "stubborn" in assessing President George W. Bush during June of the 2004 presidential campaign.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.