Skip Navigation

Public Opinion Quarterly 2006 70(1):48-65; doi:10.1093/poq/nfj011
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Korey, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lascher, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Macropartisanship in California

John L. Korey and Edward L. Lascher, Jr.

JOHN L. KOREY is a professor in the Department of Political Science at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. EDWARD L. LASCHER JR. is professor and chair of the Department of Public Policy and Administration, California State University, Sacramento.

Address correspondence to Edward L. Lascher Jr.; e-mail: tedl{at}csus.edu.

Political scientists have devoted considerable, well-justified attention to changes in macropartisanship at the national level but have generally ignored movement in aggregate party identification at the American state level. The case of California is especially interesting for a number of reasons, most notably because of the potential impact of rapid ethnic change on aggregate political attitudes. In this article we assess macropartisanship in the Golden State from 1980 through 2001, drawing on Field Polls of California adults. We find that essentially there have been two eras in recent state history: a period of increasing Republican identification up to 1991 and an era of increasing Democratic identification thereafter. Some of this apparent movement to the Democrats among Californians as a whole is attributable to the increasing Latino share of the Field Poll samples and the decision to offer the survey in Spanish. However, there has also been movement toward the Democratic Party within ethnic and racial subgroups. This movement can be found to some degree in all major groups (except for African Americans, who were already overwhelmingly identified with the Democratic Party), but it has been especially pronounced among Latinos and Asian Americans. We consider possible reasons and discuss potential implications.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
S. Lee, H. A. Nguyen, M. Jawad, and J. Kurata
Linguistic Minorities in a Health Survey
Public Opin Q, September 1, 2008; 72(3): 470 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.