Skip Navigation

Public Opinion Quarterly 2006 70(1):88-98; doi:10.1093/poq/nfj008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keeter, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

The Impact of Cell Phone Noncoverage Bias on Polling in the 2004 Presidential Election

Scott Keeter

Pew Research Center

Address correspondence to the author; e-mail: skeeter{at}pewresearch.org.

Despite concerns that the accuracy of preelection telephone polls would be harmed by the omission of voters who could be reached only by cell phone, most national polls performed well in predicting President George W. Bush’s reelection in 2004, and state polls were generally accurate as well. The national exit poll conducted by the National Election Pool found that 7 percent of Election Day voters had cell phone service but no land line; younger voters were far more likely to be cell-only: 19 percent among those age 18–24 and 20 percent among those age 25–29. Within these two youngest age cohorts, cell-only voters were significantly more likely to be single and childless. While cell-only voters were more supportive of John Kerry than voters overall, they were similar to other voters within their own age cohort. Because of this, preelection telephone surveys that weighted their data appropriately by age were not significantly biased by the absence of the cell-only voters.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Public Opin ResHome page
M. Callegaro and G. Gasperoni
Accuracy of Pre-Election Polls for the 2006 Italian Parliamentary Election: Too Close to Call
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., June 1, 2008; 20(2): 148 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
C. Tucker, J. Michael Brick, and B. Meekins
Household Telephone Service and Usage Patterns in the United States in 2004: Implications for telephone samples
Public Opin Q, March 3, 2007; (2007) nfl047v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
J. M. Brick and C. Tucker
Mitofsky Waksberg: Learning From The Past
Public Opin Q, January 1, 2007; 71(5): 703 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
J. Ehlen and P. Ehlen
Cellular-Only Substitution in the United States as Lifestyle Adoption: Implications for Telephone Survey Coverage
Public Opin Q, January 1, 2007; 71(5): 717 - 733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
S. Keeter, C. Kennedy, A. Clark, T. Tompson, and M. Mokrzycki
What's Missing from National Landline RDD Surveys?: The Impact of the Growing Cell-Only Population
Public Opin Q, January 1, 2007; 71(5): 772 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
M. W. Link, M. P. Battaglia, M. R. Frankel, L. Osborn, and A. H. Mokdad
Reaching the U.S. Cell Phone Generation: Comparison of Cell Phone Survey Results with an Ongoing Landline Telephone Survey
Public Opin Q, January 1, 2007; 71(5): 814 - 839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
J. M. Brick, S. Dipko, S. Presser, C. Tucker, and Y. Yuan
Nonresponse Bias in a Dual Frame Sample of Cell and Landline Numbers
Public Opin Q, January 1, 2006; 70(5): 780 - 793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.