Skip Navigation


Public Opinion Quarterly Advance Access originally published online on August 10, 2007
Public Opinion Quarterly 2007 71(3):349-366; doi:10.1093/poq/nfm020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
71/3/349    most recent
nfm020v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tenpas, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by McCann, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Testing the Permanence of the Permanent Campaign

An Analysis of Presidential Polling Expenditures, 1977–2002

Kathryn Dunn Tenpas and James A. McCann

Address correspondence to James A. McCann; e-mail: mccannj{at}purdue.edu.

Many presidential observers argue that the modern White House is the site of more-or-less permanent campaigning. In a recent POQ piece, Murray and Howard (2002) [Public Opinion Quarterly 66:527–558] explore one indicator of the "permanent campaign," the extent to which Presidents Carter, Reagan, G.H.W. Bush, and Clinton commissioned independent opinion polls and focus groups to assist in policymaking and political maneuvering. Murray and Howard suggest that while a sophisticated polling operation has been institutionalized in the White House, there is substantial variation in how much a president uses this operation. In this article, we model presidential polling expenditures over time using monthly figures. We find that presidents do not vary significantly in the average amount spent per month on polls. There are, however, two recurring patterns of variation within presidential administrations: Presidents tend to spend significantly more on internal polling during the most intense months of a presidential reelection campaign; and polling expenditures increase over the course of each presidential term. These findings suggest that there are common forces (e.g., elections, natural decline in support) that have driven all presidents since Ford to poll.


KATHRYN DUNN TENPAS is the Director of the University of Pennsylvania Washington Semester Program, 1608 Rhode Island Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA. JAMES A. MCCANN is Professor of Political Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2004 meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL. We thank Sarah Binder, Tom Mann, Anthony King, Brandon Rottinghaus and the POQ reviewers for helpful advice. In addition, we are indebted to Andrew Furlow, Sarah Taylor, and, especially, Emily Charnock for research assistance. Tenpas would like to thank the Weidenbaum Center at Washington University in St. Louis for providing support during the academic years 2004–2005. The authors are solely responsible for the analyses and interpretations presented here. Replication data files are available upon request.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Harvard International Journal of Press/PoliticsHome page
C. Conaghan and C. de la Torre
The Permanent Campaign of Rafael Correa: Making Ecuador's Plebiscitary Presidency
International Journal of Press/Politics, July 1, 2008; 13(3): 267 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.