Skip Navigation


Public Opinion Quarterly Advance Access originally published online on May 7, 2008
Public Opinion Quarterly 2008 72(2):167-189; doi:10.1093/poq/nfn011
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
72/2/167    most recent
nfn011v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Groves, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Peytcheva, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias

A Meta-Analysis

Robert M. Groves and Emilia Peytcheva

Address correspondence to Robert M. Groves; e-mail: bgroves{at}isr.umich.edu

Fifty-nine methodological studies were designed to estimate the magnitude of nonresponse bias in statistics of interest. These studies use a variety of designs: sampling frames with rich variables, data from administrative records matched to sample case, use of screening-interview data to describe nonrespondents to main interviews, followup of nonrespondents to initial phases of field effort, and measures of behavior intentions to respond to a survey. This permits exploration of which circumstances produce a relationship between nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias and which, do not. The predictors are design features of the surveys, characteristics of the sample, and attributes of the survey statistics computed in the surveys.

ROBERT M. GROVES is with University of Michigan, 426 Thompson Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48106, USA. EMILIA PEYTCHEVA is with Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Appreciation for research support from the US National Science Foundation grant SES-0207435.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 AJPHHome page
S. Lee, E. R. Brown, D. Grant, T. R. Belin, and J. M. Brick
Exploring Nonresponse Bias in a Health Survey Using Neighborhood Characteristics
Am J Public Health, October 1, 2009; 99(10): 1811 - 1817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
M. Roland, M. Elliott, G. Lyratzopoulos, J. Barbiere, R. A Parker, P. Smith, P. Bower, and J. Campbell
Reliability of patient responses in pay for performance schemes: analysis of national General Practitioner Patient Survey data in England
BMJ, September 29, 2009; 339(sep29_3): b3851 - b3851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Environment and BehaviorHome page
J. E. Cross, D. Zimmerman, and M. A. O'Grady
Residence Hall Room Type and Alcohol Use Among College Students Living on Campus
Environment and Behavior, July 1, 2009; 41(4): 583 - 603.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Opin QHome page
M. Callegaro and C. Disogra
Computing Response Metrics for Online Panels
Public Opin Q, January 29, 2009; (2009) nfn065v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
T. J. Beebe, S. M. Jenkins, K. J. Anderson, and M. E. Davern
Survey-Related Experiential and Attitudinal Correlates of Future Health Survey Participation: Results of a Statewide Survey
Mayo Clin. Proc., December 1, 2008; 83(12): 1358 - 1363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav Res MethodsHome page
A. S. GORITZ, H.-G. WOLFF, and D. G. GOLDSTEIN
Individual payments as a longer-term incentive in online panels
Behav Res Methods, November 1, 2008; 40(4): 1144 - 1149.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.