Skip Navigation


Public Opinion Quarterly Advance Access originally published online on November 13, 2008
Public Opinion Quarterly 2008 72(4):768-780; doi:10.1093/poq/nfn057
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
72/4/768    most recent
nfn057v2
nfn057v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Orr, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Experimenting with a "Third Way" in Political Knowledge Estimation

Melissa K. Miller and Shannon K. Orr

Address correspondence to Melissa K. Miller; e-mail: melissm{at}bgsu.edu.

Political knowledge is a key variable in the study of political behavior known to predict political discussion, voter turnout, issue-based voting, and support for democratic norms. Yet the appropriate method of measuring political knowledge is the subject of controversy. The traditional technique, which encourages survey respondents to say "don't know" (DK) if they are uncertain of the correct answer, has been called into question. Recent work has suggested that the DK response should be discouraged. We argue that a better design eliminates the DK option altogether. A web survey is employed utilizing an experimental design. Three different strategies for measuring political knowledge are tested: the first encourages the DK response; the second discourages the DK response; and the third omits the DK option. In its absence, nonrandom psychological factors are eliminated and estimates of political knowledge are higher in comparison to the other two strategies. Implications for measurement, methodology, and survey administration are discussed.


MELISSA K. MILLER AND SHANNON K. ORR are with the Political Science Department, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA. A previous version of this paper was presented at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. The authors would like to thank participants on the "Questions of Measurement" panel, Peter Miller and Patricia Moy of Public Opinion Quarterly, three anonymous reviewers, Neil Englehart, and Marco Nardone for their comments and support for this research. This research was funded through the support of Hosted Survey. All errors and omissions are the responsibility of the authors.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.