Skip Navigation


Public Opinion Quarterly Advance Access originally published online on May 21, 2009
Public Opinion Quarterly 2009 73(2):281-303; doi:10.1093/poq/nfp025
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
73/2/281    most recent
nfp025v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Couper, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Marvin, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Taking the Audio Out of Audio-CASI

Mick P. Couper, Roger Tourangeau and Theresa Marvin

Address correspondence to Mick P. Couper; e-mail: mcouper{at}umich.edu

Audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (audio-CASI or ACASI) has been widely adopted around the world as a method for eliciting more candid responses to sensitive questions in surveys. While few studies have explored the added advantages audio may bring over text-CASI, those that have (e.g., Tourangeau and Smith, 1996, Public Opinion Quarterly 60(2):275–304) found large effects for self administration over interviewer administration, but only modest additional gains from the audio enhancement. In this paper, we explore the use of audio-CASI versus text-CASI in a national survey of fertility-related issues in the United States (the National Survey of Family Growth). In the pretest, male and female respondents were randomly assigned to audio-CASI (n = 299) or text-CASI (n = 312). We compare the distributions of substantive responses between modes and examine a variety of paradata (e.g., keystroke files, time stamps) to examine the use of the CASI instruments. The main study, which interviewed 7,643 women and 4,928 men aged 15–44 in 2002–03, used audio-CASI only, but again we have a variety of paradata and interviewer debriefing items to examine the extent to which subjects made use of the audio enhancements to CASI. Our results indicate that most respondents make limited use of the audio features of audio-CASI and accordingly the gains produced by this technology are modest relative to text-CASI.


MICK P. COUPER is with the Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, PO Box 1248, Ann Arbor, MI 48106, USA. ROGER TOURANGEAU is with the Joint Program in Survey Methodology, 1218 LeFrak Hall, College Park, MD 20742, USA. THERESA MARVIN is with the Survey Research Center, PO Box 1248, Ann Arbor, MI 48106, USA. This research was supported in part by the National Center for Health Statistics, through the National Survey of Family Growth (contract 200-20000-7001; Robert Groves, Principal Investigator), and by the Survey Research Center, University of Michigan. We thank several reviewers for their helpful suggestions. All views expressed herein and any errors remain our own.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.