Skip Navigation


Public Opinion Quarterly Advance Access originally published online on July 21, 2009
Public Opinion Quarterly 2009 73(3):537-550; doi:10.1093/poq/nfp038
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
73/3/537    most recent
nfp038v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Petrolia, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharjee, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Revisiting Incentive Effects

Evidence from a Random-Sample Mail Survey on Consumer Preferences for Fuel Ethanol

Daniel R. Petrolia and Sanjoy Bhattacharjee

Address correspondence to Daniel R. Petrolia; e-mail: petrolia{at}agecon.msstate.edu

This study revisits the issue of monetary incentive effects utilizing data from a mail survey sent to a random sample of adults across the United States regarding preferences for fuel ethanol. The results reported here are consistent with those found in the literature regarding the effect of incentives on response rates: they improved them, with prepaid incentives performing relatively better. We also found that state of residence was significantly correlated with choosing whether to respond to a survey. Regarding the effect of incentives on sample composition, we found that incentives tended to bias the sample in favor of less educated respondents, and tended to attract respondents less familiar with the survey subject. Finally, results indicate that incentives had very little effect on item nonresponse. Instead, item nonresponse was driven by education level, gender, and familiarity with the survey subject. However, combining the findings on sample composition with those of item nonresponse, it appears that the use of incentives indirectly affects item nonresponse by recruiting relatively more respondents that are less educated and/or less familiar with the survey topic, who are then less likely to respond to all questions.


DANIEL R. PETROLIA AND SANJOY BHATTACHARJEE are with the Mississippi State University, Department of Agricultural Economics, Howell Engineering Bldg., Box 5187, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA. The authors would like to thank Bill Herndon for suggesting the idea for this paper and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. This work was performed through the Sustainable Energy Research Center at Mississippi State University (supported by the Department of Energy contract to William D. Batchelor, award number DE-FG3606GO86025).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.