Skip Navigation



Public Opinion Quarterly Advance Access published online on December 9, 2008

Public Opinion Quarterly, doi:10.1093/poq/nfn061
This Article
Right arrow Summary
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
72/5/962    most recent
nfn061v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rookey, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dillman, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Does a Probability-Based Household Panel Benefit from Assignment to Postal Response as an Alternative to Internet-Only?

Bryan D. Rookey, Steve Hanway and Don A. Dillman

Address correspondence to Bryan Rookey; e-mail: bdrookey{at}wsu.edu

A potential limitation of web-only panels of the general public, even when households are selected using probability methods, is that only about 70 percent of U.S. households have members with Internet access. In addition, some members of Internet-connected households may be unable or unwilling to participate over the web. The Gallup Panel uses both web and mail modes to survey respondents and in 2006 included approximately 50,000 households selected by random-digit dialing. Frequent Internet users were assigned to respond by the web, while others were assigned to participate by mail using a paper questionnaire with a similar visual layout to the web. We use several approaches to determine whether or not the mail option adds value to the results in an otherwise Internet panel and organize our analyses around answering a series of questions. First, does the use of mail allow different types of people to be included? Second, do mail and web respondents give different answers to the same questions? Third, does weighting on and controlling for demographics eliminate any differences in responses from mail and web respondents and indicate that mail is not needed? Finally, do differences exist when responses are collected using an independent mode? In general, the answers to these questions suggest that use of mail adds value to the panel results and improves the overall accuracy of survey results.


BRYAN D. ROOKEY AND DON A. DILLMAN are with Social and Economic Sciences Research Center, Washington State University, P.O. Box 644014, Pullman, WA 99164-4014, USA. STEVE HANWAY is with The Gallup Organization, 901 F Street NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC, USA. We gratefully acknowledge with thanks help with earlier versions of the paper provided by Julie Curd, Darby Miller Steiger, Larry Curd, and Ron Bartholomew of The Gallup Organization; Zac Arens, formerly of The Gallup Organization; and Jolene Smyth at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Analysis of these data was supported by funds provided by The Gallup Organization to the Social and Economic Sciences Research Center at Washington State University.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.