Skip Navigation



Public Opinion Quarterly Advance Access published online on March 19, 2009

Public Opinion Quarterly, doi:10.1093/poq/nfp004
This Article
Right arrow Summary
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
73/1/159    most recent
nfp004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murray, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Scime, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Pre-Election Polling: Identifying Likely Voters Using Iterative Expert Data Mining

Gregg R. Murray, Chris Riley and Anthony Scime

Address correspondence to Gregg R. Murray; e-mail: g.murray{at}ttu.edu.

One often-noted difficulty in pre-election polling is the identification of likely voters. Our objective is to build a likely voter model for presidential elections that efficiently balances accuracy and number of questions used. We employ the Iterative Expert Data Mining technique and data from the American National Election Studies to identify a small number of survey questions that can be used to classify likely voters while maintaining or surpassing the accuracy rates of other models. Specifically, we propose two survey items that together correctly classify 78 percent of respondents as voters or nonvoters over a multielection, multidecade period. We argue that our proposed model compares favorably to competing models by capturing the successful elements of those models while ignoring other elements that constrain identification. We end by suggesting that our model offers a new approach to identifying and evaluating likely voters that may maintain or increase accuracy without also increasing cost.


GREGG R. MURRAY is with the Department of Political Science, Texas Tech University, Box 41015, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA. CHRIS RILEY is with the Department of Political Science, Binghamton University, PO Box 6000, Binghamton, NY 13902, USA. ANTHONY SCIME is with the Department of Computer Science, The College at Brockport, State University of New York, Brockport, NY 14420, USA. We are grateful for the helpful comments of Dena Levy, Kulathur S. Rajasethupathy, and the anonymous reviewers. We are especially grateful for the financial support of Andrea Ciliotta-Rubery.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.