Skip Navigation

Public Opinion Quarterly 2006 70(3):416-418; doi:10.1093/poq/nfl012
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Letters to the Editor

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.


    To: Editor, Public Opinion Quarterly
 
From: Gary Langer and Jon Cohen

We appreciate the ongoing discussion of the inclusion of "moral values" on the issues list in the National Election Pool’s (NEP) 2004 exit poll. The subject has important methodological and analytical implications; we welcome data and informed debate on the construction of exit poll questions that are meaningful and, given their same-day use, clearly and easily interpretable.

Howard Schuman suggests that an open-ended question in a Pew Research Center survey immediately after the election provides ex post facto justification for including "moral values" on the issues list. To the contrary, we see these data as an object lesson in media priming. The Pew poll was conducted . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?