| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.
Introduction
Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys
ELEANOR SINGER is Research Professor Emerita in the Survey Methodology Program, Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
Address correspondence to the author; e-mail: esinger@isr.umich.edu.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The basis for unbiased inference from relatively small observed samples to largely unobserved populations is probability sampling. Such samples, in turn, provide the foundation for studies that inform national, regional, and local economic, social, and health policies, as well as marketing and political decisions (e.g., National Research Council 2006
). Underlying this inferential process, however, is the assumption that all elements designated for the sample are actually observed or measured. In recent years, increasing violation of this assumption because of an inability to contact sample members or because of their unwillingness to participate has led to increasing attention to survey nonresponse. "Nonrespondents" are those missing from a probability sample; the largest components of nonresponse, and therefore those of greatest concern to survey methodologists, are noncontact and refusal. These components have different causes and may, therefore, have different consequences for survey estimates (Groves and Couper 1998; Groves, this issue).
Concern
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. Finkelhor, H. Turner, R. Ormrod, and S. L. Hamby Violence, Abuse, and Crime Exposure in a National Sample of Children and Youth Pediatrics, November 1, 2009; 124(5): 1411 - 1423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. H. Odierna and L. A. Schmidt The Effects of Failing to Include Hard-to-Reach Respondents in Longitudinal Surveys Am J Public Health, August 1, 2009; 99(8): 1515 - 1521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. C. Johnson and G. A. Kercher Identifying Predictors of Negative Psychological Reactions to Stalking Victimization J Interpers Violence, May 1, 2009; 24(5): 866 - 882. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. J. McMorris, R. S. Petrie, R. F. Catalano, C. B. Fleming, K. P. Haggerty, and R. D. Abbott Use of Web and In-Person Survey Modes to Gather Data From Young Adults on Sex and Drug Use: An Evaluation of Cost, Time, and Survey Error Based on a Randomized Mixed-Mode Design Eval Rev, April 1, 2009; 33(2): 138 - 158. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Bautista, M. Callegaro, J. A. Vera, and F. Abundis Studying Nonresponse in Mexican Exit Polls Int. J. Public Opin. Res., December 1, 2007; 19(4): 492 - 503. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|