Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Summary
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JENNINGS, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Public Opinion Quarterly 60:228-252 (1996)
© 1996 American Association for Public Opinion Research

POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE OVER TIME AND ACROSS GENERATIONS

M. KENT JENNINGS

M. KENT JENNINGS is professor of political science of the University of California, Santa Barbara, and at the University of Michigan. This article is a revised version of a paper originally presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September 2–5, 1993. The research draws on a project that has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Aging. The technical assistance of Donna Wasserman and Lisa D'Ambrosio is gratefully acknowledged.

The importance of factual political knowledge in affecting information processing and political behavior has recently received considerable attention. However, relatively little is known about the dynamics of such knowledge over long periods of time. This article utilizes a national two-generation, threewave panel study stretching from 1965 to 1982 to address the issue of dynamics at both the aggregate and individual level. Factual knowledge is divided into the domains of governmental mechanics (textbook knowledge), current events (surveillance knowledge), and historical facts (treated here under the rubric of collective memories). Comparison of the two generations shows that high aggregate continuity sets in by the early stages of midlife, with the young generation showing sharp losses of textbook knowledge but gains in other types. Distinctive generational differences appear with respect to certain events occurring at early, formative life stages. The size of the generation gap depends on time of birth as well as time of observation. Individual-level continuity for mature adults rivals that occurring for strongly held attitudes. Trends within the younger generation indicate the same kind of crystallization process that marks many political attitudes. In view of the high degree of individual-and aggregate-level stability among mature adults, special attention rests on the content of the knowledge that is being hardened and internalized during the early adult years.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of Behavioral DevelopmentHome page
B. Gniewosz, P. Noack, and M. Buhl
Political alienation in adolescence: Associations with parental role models, parenting styles, and classroom climate
International Journal of Behavioral Development, July 1, 2009; 33(4): 337 - 346.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ChildhoodHome page
J. Habashi
Palestinian Children Crafting National Identity
Childhood, February 1, 2008; 15(1): 12 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
New Media SocietyHome page
K. D. Sweetser and L. Lee Kaid
Stealth soapboxes: political information efficacy, cynicism and uses of celebrity weblogs among readers
New Media Society, February 1, 2008; 10(1): 67 - 91.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
L. L. Kaid, M. S. McKinney, and J. C. Tedesco
Introduction: Political Information Efficacy and Young Voters
American Behavioral Scientist, May 1, 2007; 50(9): 1093 - 1111.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Education, Citizenship and Social JusticeHome page
M. F. Astiz and G. Mendez
Education for citizenship: The Argentine case in comparison
Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, July 1, 2006; 1(2): 175 - 200.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science polHome page
P. Howe
Political Knowledge and Electoral Participation in the Netherlands: Comparisons with the Canadian Case
International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science pol, April 1, 2006; 27(2): 137 - 166.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
J. A. McCann and C. Lawson
Presidential Campaigns and the Knowledge Gap in Three Transitional Democracies
Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2006; 59(1): 13 - 22.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
J. L. Gibson
Overcoming Apartheid: Can Truth Reconcile a Divided Nation?
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, January 1, 2006; 603(1): 82 - 110.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
M. Tessler, C. Konold, and M. Reif
Political Generations in Developing Countries: Evidence and Insights from Algeria
Public Opin Q, June 1, 2004; 68(2): 184 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
H. Schuman and W. L. Rodgers
Cohorts, Chronology, and Collective Memories
Public Opin Q, June 1, 2004; 68(2): 217 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.