Skip Navigation

Public Opinion Quarterly 2004 68(4):512-541; doi:10.1093/poq/nfh038
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hutchings, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by White, I. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 68 No. 4 © American Association for Public Opinion Research 2004; all rights reserved.

The Compassion Strategy

Race and the Gender Gap in Campaign 2000

Vincent L. Hutchings, Nicholas A. Valentino, Tasha S. Philpot and Ismail K. White

VINCENT L. HUTCHINGS is an associate professor of political science, and research associate professor in the Center for Political Studies, at the University of Michigan. NICHOLAS A. VALENTINO is an associate professor of communications studies and political science, and research associate professor in the Center for Political Studies, at the University of Michigan. TASHA S. PHILPOT is an assistant professor in the Department of Government at the University of Texas at Austin. ISMAIL K. WHITE is an assistant professor in the Department of Government at the University of Texas at Austin. This research would not have been possible without the efforts of several researsch assistants, including Dmitri Williams, Lara Rusch, Matthew Beckmann, and Dara Faris.

Address correspondence to Vincent L. Hutchings; e-mail: vincenth{at}umich.edu.

Recent studies have shown that social "compassion" issues, and not those directly linked to women’s interests, seem to drive the gender gap in presidential vote choice. Some of these compassion issues are associated with the plight of racial minorities in the media and in the minds of average citizens. Drawing on theories of gender role socialization, we predict that traditional partisan stands on racial issues may help to explain the gender gap. Specifically, we hypothesize that the gap emerges because men and women react differently to cues about how compassionate candidates are toward vulnerable social groups. In one experiment, we manipulate news information regarding George W. Bush’s commitment to blacks versus women. The gender gap is maximized when Bush takes the traditional Republican stance, while it is reduced significantly when Bush espouses a more moderate position. The gender gap is unaffected by variation in the position that Bush takes on women’s issues. In another experiment, we also find that the gender gap emerges when traditional partisan appeals are racialized. Finally, exposure to the 2000 Republican National Convention, with its message of racial inclusion, boosted evaluations of Bush among women but not men.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.