Skip Navigation

Public Opinion Quarterly 2005 69(5):698-715; doi:10.1093/poq/nfi062
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenstiel, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Polling and the Media

Political Polling and the New Media Culture: A Case of More Being Less

Tom Rosenstiel

TOM ROSENSTIEL is founder and director of the Project for Excellence in Journalism, a research institute on the news media affiliated with the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism.

Address correspondence to the author; e-mail: tomrosen{at}journalism.org.

Changes in journalism—including newsroom cutbacks, an emphasis on repackaging secondhand material, and the demands of 24-hour news—have expanded the reliance on polls as news, including polls of a sort once considered not reliable for publication, and led to a more superficial understanding of the 2004 presidential race. The proliferation of outlets offering news, which has resulted in greater competition for audience, has also intensified the motivation of using polls in part for their marketing value rather than purely their probative journalistic value. The more "synthetic" style of contemporary journalism has increased the tendency to allow polls to create a context for journalists to explain and organize other news—becoming the lens through which reporters see and order a more interpretative news environment. A greater dependence on horse race tracking polls by the media has reinforced these tendencies and further thinned the public’s understanding toward who won and away from why. Growing audience skepticism and political polarization have created an environment of distrust about the methodology and integrity of polling. All of these factors, in turn, are frustrating the efforts of academic and commercial pollsters to maintain standards and deepen understanding among journalists about public opinion research and how to use it as journalism.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JournalismHome page
E. Mitchelstein and P. J. Boczkowski
Between tradition and change: A review of recent research on online news production
Journalism, October 1, 2009; 10(5): 562 - 586.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
C. Zukin
Presidential Address: The Future Is Here!: Where Are We Now? and How Do We Get There?
Public Opin Q, September 1, 2006; 70(3): 426 - 442.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.