Skip Navigation

Public Opinion Quarterly 2006 70(4):477-498; doi:10.1093/poq/nfl022
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murray, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Private Polls and Presidential Policymaking

Reagan as a Facilitator of Change

Shoon Kathleen Murray

SHOON KATHLEEN MURRAY is an Associate Professor at the School of International Service, American University.

Address correspondence to the author; e-mail: smurray{at}american.edu.

Did the Reagan administration disregard majority will when crafting its policy initiatives? Did it cater to a narrow partisan constituency instead? The answers to these questions will help with an assessment of Jacobs and Shapiro’s (2000b) hypothesis that presidents since the late 1970s have used private White House survey research as a tool to manipulate or assuage centrist public opinion while meeting the policy demands of their partisan core supporters, resulting in a decline in presidential responsiveness to majority will. Using the actual surveys administered by Richard Wirthlin (Reagan’s pollster) between 1981 and 1983, this article will demonstrate the level of consistency between majority opinion on 129 policy issues and Reagan’s behavior through 1984, and it will explore the conditions under which the president was more or less likely to respond to public preferences. The data reveal that the Reagan administration was constrained by the popular will in predicable ways: if the policy issues were about domestic concerns, highly popular, and visible in the media, then the administration acted in line with public preferences more than 70 percent of the time. Further, Reagan and his advisers were selective in responding to party activists: they championed issues drawn from their conservative ideological agenda that fit with the current tide in public opinion, while sidestepping other issues dear to party activists that encountered strong majority resistance. While I do not contest Jacobs and Shapiro’s (2000b) important observation that presidents often use survey research to "craft talk" in an attempt to channel the public debate, the evidence here highlights how the president nonetheless remains constrained by the popular will, at least on domestic issues.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.