Skip Navigation


Public Opinion Quarterly Advance Access originally published online on August 14, 2007
Public Opinion Quarterly 2007 71(3):325-348; doi:10.1093/poq/nfm024
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
71/3/325    most recent
nfm024v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holbrook, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Tourangeau, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Response Order Effects in Dichotomous Categorical Questions Presented Orally

The Impact of Question and Respondent Attributes

Allyson L. Holbrook, Jon A. Krosnick, David Moore and Roger Tourangeau

Address correspondence to Allyson L. Holbrook; (e-mail: allyson{at}uic.edu) or Jon A. Krosnick (e-mail: krosnick{at}stanford.edu).

Using data from 548 experiments in telephone surveys conducted by the Gallup Organization, we explored how attributes of questions and respondents moderate response order effects in dichotomous categorical questions. These effects were predominantly recency effects and occurred most in questions that were more difficult to comprehend (especially among respondents with the least education), with response choices that were more difficult to comprehend (because they were complete sentences instead of words or phrases and because they were not mutually exclusive), and that were asked after many prior questions. Recency effects were also more common in questions that explicitly or implicitly encouraged respondents to wait until they had heard all the answer choices before formulating a judgment than in questions that induced respondents to begin formulating a judgment before all the answer choices had been read (especially among the least educated respondents). A study of interviewer behavior revealed patterns of pausing between and within sentences that help to explain why some types of questions are especially prone to recency effects and others are not.

ALLYSON L. HOLBROOK is with the University of Illinois, Chicago, USA. JON A. KROSNICK is with Stanford University, CA, USA. DAVID MOORE is with the University of New Hampshire, and ROGER TOURANGEAU is with the Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA and also with Joint Program in Survey Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

The survey results reported here were obtained from searches of the iPOLL Databank and other resources provided by the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.