Skip Navigation

Public Opinion Quarterly 2007 71(5):717-733; doi:10.1093/poq/nfm048
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ehlen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ehlen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Cellular-Only Substitution in the United States as Lifestyle Adoption

Implications for Telephone Survey Coverage

John Ehlen and Patrick Ehlen

Please address correspondence to either author.

Historically, the coverage bias from excluding the United States cell-only population from survey samples has been minimal due to the relatively small size of this group. However, the unrelenting growth of this segment has sparked growing concern that telephone surveys of the general public in the United States will become increasingly subject to coverage bias. While there is evidence that demographic weighting can be used to eliminate this bias, the availability of the weights lag behind the rapidly changing cell-only population. To explain the extent of the problem, we propose a reliable model to forecast cell-only population size and demographics. This model posits that a stable behavioral process, the rate of habit retention, can be estimated from prior wireless lifestyle adoption in the United States and may also describe adoption of the cell-only lifestyle. Using measures of incentive and habituation, we test this assumption by predicting changes in the cell-only population size and changes in age demographics. The accuracy of predictions confirms the two adoption behaviors are similar. We then develop forecasts of age demographics through 2009, and show how cell-only lifestyle adoption leads to potential coverage bias that is better addressed through this type of modeling rather than weighting from historical data.


JOHN EHLEN is with Applied Econometrics West, PO Box 1128, Fraser, CO 80442, USA; e-mail: jehlen{at}yahoo.com.

PATRICK EHLEN is with the Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, Cordura Hall, 210 Panama Street, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; e-mail: ehlen{at}stanford.edu. The authors wish to thank Paul Lavarakas and three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.