Skip Navigation

Public Opinion Quarterly 2007 71(5):750-771; doi:10.1093/poq/nfm050
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kennedy, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Evaluating the Effects of Screening for Telephone Service in Dual Frame RDD Surveys

Courtney Kennedy

e-mail: ckkenned{at}umich.edu.

The high costs and largely unknown error properties of cellular telephone interviews make screening for cell-only adults a potentially attractive option in dual frame RDD surveys. Screening out adults with landline telephones from the cellular sample does not affect the coverage properties of a dual frame survey, but it may affect other sources of error, especially nonresponse. In this study, data from a 2006 dual frame RDD survey conducted for the Pew Research Center, the Associated Press, and AOL are used to evaluate the effects of implementing a cell-only screener on both the bias and variance of weighted survey estimates. The effect of screening appears to be minimal so long as an adjustment for telephone service is included in the weighting method. Results of an attempt to correct for residual nonresponse due to inaccessibility are also discussed.


COURTNEY KENNEDY is with the University of Michigan Program in Survey Methodology, 426 Thompson Street, Room 4050, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA. I am grateful to the Pew Research Center for the use of these data and, in particular, to Scott Keeter for engaging me in the topic. I would also like to thank Roger Tourangeau, Robert M. Groves and J. Michael Brick for their invaluable comments on earlier versions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.