Skip Navigation

Public Opinion Quarterly 2007 71(5):772-792; doi:10.1093/poq/nfm053
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keeter, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mokrzycki, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

What's Missing from National Landline RDD Surveys?

The Impact of the Growing Cell-Only Population

Scott Keeter, Courtney Kennedy, April Clark, Trevor Tompson and Mike Mokrzycki

e-mail: skeeter{at}pewresearch.org

The number of cell phone only households has continued to grow – 12.8 percent of all households by the end of 2006, according to the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). To assess the extent and nature of the potential bias in landline telephone samples created by the absence of cell-only households, the Pew Research Center conducted four independent dual frame studies in 2006, three of which included at least 200 interviews with cell-only respondents. Despite the fact that there are significant differences between cell-only and landline respondents on many important variables, across the four surveys with different substantive content we find that including a cell-only sample with a landline RDD sample produces general population estimates that are nearly identical to those from the landline sample alone. Yet, while the noncoverage problem is currently not damaging estimates for the entire population, we find evidence that it does create biased estimates on certain variables for young adults, 25 percent of whom are cell-only according to the most recent government estimate.


SCOTT KEETER is with Pew Research Center, 1615 L St., N.W., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20036, USA.

COURTNEY KENNEDY is with Pew Research Center and the University of Michigan, 426 Thompson Street, Room 4050, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA.

APRIL CLARK is with Pew Research Center, 1615 L St., N.W., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20036, USA.

TREVOR TOMPSON is with The Associated Press, 2021 K St., N.W., 6th floor, Washington, DC 20006, USA.

MIKE MOKRZYCKI is with The Associated Press, 168 Middle St., West Newbury, MA 01985, USA. The authors are grateful for the assistance of several individuals and organizations. Princeton Survey Research Associates International (PSRAI) and SRBI, Inc. collected the data reported here. The advice and assistance of Jonathan Best, Larry Hugick, Stacy Diangelo, and Julie Gasior at PSRAI, and Chintan Turakhia, Dean Williams, and Mark Schulman at SRBI was invaluable. Anna Fleeman, Charlotte Steeh, Linda Piekarski, Mike Brick, Clyde Tucker, and Stephen Blumberg regularly answered questions for us and provided us with updates from their own research with the cell phone population. The Pew Research Center and The Associated Press provided substantial support for the conduct of this research. We greatly benefited from the help and advice of Andrew Kohut, Michael Dimock, Nilanthi Samaranayake, Robert Suls, Greg Smith, Cary Funk, Juliana Horowitz, Richard Wike, Peyton Craighill, Lee Rainie, and John Horrigan. Paul Lavrakas and two anonymous reviewers provided excellent feedback on an earlier draft. The 2005 Cell Phone Sampling Summit II, organized by Paul Lavrakas and Chuck Shuttles, provided ideas and inspiration for this work.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.