Skip Navigation

Public Opinion Quarterly 2007 71(5):814-839; doi:10.1093/poq/nfm051
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Link, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Mokdad, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Reaching the U.S. Cell Phone Generation

Comparison of Cell Phone Survey Results with an Ongoing Landline Telephone Survey

Michael W. Link, Michael P. Battaglia, Martin R. Frankel, Larry Osborn and Ali H. Mokdad

e-mail: Michael.Link{at}Nielsen.com

Noncoverage rates in U.S. landline-based telephone samples due to cell phone only households (i.e., households with no landline but accessible by cell phone) and the corresponding potential for bias in estimates from surveys that sample only from landline frames are growing issues. Building on some of the few published studies that focus on this problem, a study was conducted in three states (Georgia, New Mexico, and Pennsylvania) as part of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), the world's largest ongoing public health telephone survey, to evaluate the effectiveness of conducting the BRFSS interview with a sample drawn from dedicated cell phone telephone exchanges and mixed-use (landline and cell phone) exchanges. Approximately 600 interviews were conducted in each of two groups: cell phone only adults (n = 572) and adults with both a landline and a cell phone (n = 592). Making comparisons with data from the ongoing, landline-based BRFSS survey, we report on response rates, demographic characteristics of respondents, key survey estimates of health conditions and risk behaviors, and survey costs. The methods used in this study have wide application for other U.S. telephone surveys.


MICHAEL W. LINK is with Nielsen Media Research, 3784 Ardsley Ct, Marietta, GA 30062, USA.

MICHAEL P. BATTAGLIA is with Abt Associates, 55 Wheeler St. Cambridge, MA 02474, USA.

MARTIN R. FRANKEL is with 14 Patricia Lane, Cos Cobb, CT 06807, USA.

LARRY OSBORN is with Abt Associates, 55 Wheeler St. Cambridge, MA 02474, USA.

ALI H. MOKDAD is with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, MS:K66, GA, USA. We would like to thank the following BRFSS Coordinators for their assistance in conducting this study: Leah Bryan (Georgia), Wayne A Honey (New Mexico), and Robert F. Dewar (Pennsylvania). The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Abt Associates, or Baruch College, City University of New York.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. G. Zapka
Validation of Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2008; 17(4): 745 - 747.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.