Skip Navigation


Public Opinion Quarterly Advance Access originally published online on November 6, 2008
Public Opinion Quarterly 2008 72(4):677-705; doi:10.1093/poq/nfn042
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
72/4/677    most recent
nfn042v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moaddel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Inglehart, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Foreign Occupation and National Pride

The Case of Iraq

Mansoor Moaddel, Mark Tessler and Ronald Inglehart

Address correspondence to Mansoor Moaddel; e-mail: mmoaddel{at}umich.edu.

Investigators from such disparate fields as public opinion research and comparative history agree that foreign occupation tends to provoke nationalist awareness. Engaging this growing body of literature, we focus on the affective side of nationalism—the feeling of national pride—and argue that foreign domination by itself does not necessarily incite this feeling among all members of the population under occupation. Rather, (a) the perception of the occupation held by the public is related to national pride and (b) this perception is anchored in communal attributes. A survey of Iraqis (n = 2,700) in 2004 found that the only common factor that is linked to national pride for the Sunnis, Shi’is, and Kurds is attitude against foreign Muslim militants. In addition, for the Sunnis, it was linked to attitudes against foreign presence and in favor of the Baath party. For the Shi’is, national pride was inversely related to their attitudes toward American moral values. For the Kurds, national pride is linked to attitudes toward the political issues over which the Sunnis and Shi’is have consensus—attitudes against foreign presence and disbanding the former Iraqi army, and a rejection of American moral values. Implications for the study of national pride are discussed.


MANSOOR MOADDEL is with the Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Criminology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, and with Population Studies Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 426 Thompson Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1248, USA. MARK TESSLER and RONALD INGLEHART are also with the University of Michigan. Comments by Kristine Ajrouch, Julie de Jong, Stuart Karabenick, and Robert Robinson, and the editor and anonymous reviewers for Public Opinion Quarterly are gratefully appreciated. This study has been supported by two grants from the National Science Foundation (SES-0433773 and SES-0522174). The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and the NSF assumes no responsibility for these opinions, findings, and conclusions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.