Skip Navigation



Public Opinion Quarterly Advance Access published online on October 31, 2008

Public Opinion Quarterly, doi:10.1093/poq/nfn045
This Article
Right arrow Summary
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
72/5/836    most recent
nfn045v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heerwegh, D.
Right arrow Articles by Loosveldt, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Face-to-Face Versus Web Surveying in a High-Internet-Coverage Population

Differences in Response Quality

Dirk Heerwegh and Geert Loosveldt

Address correspondence to Dirk Heerwegh; e-mail: dirk.heerwegh{at}soc.kuleuven.be

The current study experimentally investigates the differences in data quality between a face-to-face and a web survey. Based on satisficing theory, it was hypothesized that web survey respondents would be more likely to satisfice for a multitude of reasons, thereby producing data of lower quality. The data show support for the hypothesis. Web survey respondents were shown to produce a higher "don't know" response rate, to differentiate less on rating scales, and to produce more item nonresponse than face-to-face survey respondents.


DIRK HEERWEGH AND GEERT LOOSVELDT are with the Center for Sociological Research (CeSO), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Parkstraat 45 Box 3601, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. The authors would like to thank Ingrid Willems of University of Antwerp, Belgium, and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on an earlier version of this paper. The first author gratefully acknowledges support for this research from a postdoctoral research grant of the KULeuven Research Fund (BOF) and from a postdoctoral research grant of the FWO Flanders (Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen). Errors remaining and views expressed are the authors’.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.