Skip Navigation



Public Opinion Quarterly Advance Access published online on May 23, 2009

Public Opinion Quarterly, doi:10.1093/poq/nfp026
This Article
Right arrow Summary
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
73/2/385    most recent
nfp026v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lavelle, B.
Right arrow Articles by Gundersen, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Synthesis

Strategies for Surveys of American Indians

Bridget Lavelle, Michael D. Larsen and Craig Gundersen

Address correspondence to Michael D. Larsen; e-mail: larsen{at}iastate.edu.

Although past researchers have sometimes labeled American Indians "hard-to-reach," a review of the literature identifies several available strategies for improving sampling and response rates for surveys of this population. After discussing various approaches to defining who is American Indian, this article summarizes the literature on challenges in conducting research in American Indian populations. The literature strongly points to the need for full and active partnerships between American Indian communities and outside researchers in order to ensure that the communities are respected, protected, and benefit from the research. Full and active partnerships also are needed to improve the quality of data collected in American Indian communities. Successful strategies used in U.S. Census Bureau enumeration efforts exemplify the recommendations for participatory research with American Indian communities.


BRIDGET LAVELLE is with the University of Michigan, 735 South State Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-3091, USA. MICHAEL D. LARSEN is with the Iowa State University, 2625 N. Loop Drive, Ames, IA 50011, USA. CRAIG GUNDERSEN is with the University of Illinois, 324 Mumford Hall, 1301 West Gregory Dr., Urbana, IL 61801-3605, USA. Craig Gundersen's research in this paper is partially funded through grant FRS No. 302070 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service through the University of Arizona, American Indian Studies Program.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.