| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title | UNDERSTANDING THE DECISION TO PARTICIPATE IN A SURVEY |
| Author(s) | ROBERT M. GROVES, ROBERT B. CIALDINI, MICK P. COUPER |
| Identifiers | Public Opinion Quarterly, volume 56, page 475 |
| Copyright | © 1992, the American Association for Public Opinion Research |
| Availability | Other sites: JSTOR [No subscription required for AAPOR members] * |
* For AAPOR membership information, or to login for access if already a member, please visit www.AAPOR.org.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Peytchev, R. K. Baxter, and L. R. Carley-Baxter Not All Survey Effort is Equal: Reduction of Nonresponse Bias and Nonresponse Error Public Opin Q, September 2, 2009; (2009) nfp037v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Campbell and A. E. Adams Why Do Rape Survivors Volunteer for Face-to-Face Interviews?: A Meta-Study of Victims' Reasons For and Concerns About Research Participation J Interpers Violence, March 1, 2009; 24(3): 395 - 405. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Zagorsky and P. Rhoton The Effects of Promised Monetary Incentives on Attrition in a Long-Term Panel Survey Public Opin Q, September 1, 2008; 72(3): 502 - 513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Kolar and I. Kolar What Respondents Really Expect From Researchers Eval Rev, August 1, 2008; 32(4): 363 - 391. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Bosnjak, W. Neubarth, M. P. Couper, W. Bandilla, and L. Kaczmirek Prenotification in Web-Based Access Panel Surveys: The Influence of Mobile Text Messaging Versus E-Mail on Response Rates and Sample Composition Social Science Computer Review, May 1, 2008; 26(2): 213 - 223. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. R. Porter and M. E. Whitcomb Mixed-Mode Contacts In Web Surveys: Paper is Not Necessarily Better Public Opin Q, December 1, 2007; 71(4): 635 - 648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Thomas, M. Bloor, and J. Frankland The process of sample recruitment: an ethnostatistical perspective Qualitative Research, November 1, 2007; 7(4): 429 - 446. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. D. Leeuw, M. Callegaro, J. Hox, E. Korendijk, and G. Lensvelt-Mulders The Influence of Advance Letters on Response in Telephone Surveys: A Meta-Analysis Public Opin Q, September 1, 2007; 71(3): 413 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Marcus, M. Bosnjak, S. Lindner, S. Pilischenko, and A. Schutz Compensating for Low Topic Interest and Long Surveys: A Field Experiment on Nonresponse in Web Surveys Social Science Computer Review, August 1, 2007; 25(3): 372 - 383. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Tsuchiya, Y. Hirai, and S. Ono A study of the properties of the item count technique Public Opin Q, June 18, 2007; (2007) nfm012v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. S. Herrnson, A. K. Stokes-Brown, and M. Hindman Campaign Politics and the Digital Divide: Constituency Characteristics, Strategic Considerations, and Candidate Internet Use in State Legislative Elections Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2007; 60(1): 31 - 42. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Blohm, J. Hox, and A. Koch The Influence of Interviewers' Contact Behavior on the Contact and Cooperation Rate in Face-to-Face Household Surveys Int. J. Public Opin. Res., March 1, 2007; 19(1): 97 - 111. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Roose, J. Lievens, and H. Waege The Joint Effect of Topic Interest and Follow-Up Procedures on the Response in a Mail Questionnaire: An Empirical Test of the Leverage-Saliency Theory in Audience Research Sociological Methods Research, February 1, 2007; 35(3): 410 - 428. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. L. Holbrook, I. C. Farrar, and S. J. Popkin Surveying a Chicago Public Housing Development: Methodological Challenges and Lessons Learned Eval Rev, December 1, 2006; 30(6): 779 - 802. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. B. Eaton, J. M. Galliher, P. E. McBride, A. J. Bonham, J. A. Kappus, and J. Hickner Family Physician's Knowledge, Beliefs, and Self-reported Practice Patterns Regarding Hyperlipidemia: A National Research Network (NRN) Survey J Am Board Fam Med, January 1, 2006; 19(1): 46 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. S. Herrnson and J. C. Lucas The Fairer Sex?: Gender and Negative Campaigning in U.S. Elections American Politics Research, January 1, 2006; 34(1): 69 - 94. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Singer Introduction: Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys Public Opin Q, January 1, 2006; 70(5): 637 - 645. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. E. Kropf and J. Blair Eliciting Survey Cooperation: Incentives, Self-Interest, and Norms of Cooperation Eval Rev, December 1, 2005; 29(6): 559 - 575. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. B. Mann Do Advance Letters Improve Preelection Forecast Accuracy? Public Opin Q, December 1, 2005; 69(4): 561 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. W. Link and A. Mokdad Advance Letters as a Means of Improving Respondent Cooperation in Random Digit Dial Studies: A Multistate Experiment Public Opin Q, December 1, 2005; 69(4): 572 - 587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. A. Hembroff, D. Rusz, A. Rafferty, H. McGee, and N. Ehrlich The Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Advance Mailings in a Telephone Survey Public Opin Q, June 1, 2005; 69(2): 232 - 245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Poggione Exploring Gender Differences in State Legislators' Policy Preferences Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2004; 57(2): 305 - 314. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. L. Francia and P. S. Herrnson The Impact of Public Finance Laws on Fundraising in State Legislative Elections American Politics Research, September 1, 2003; 31(5): 520 - 539. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Wells, W. Petralia, D. de Vaus, and H. Kendig Recruitment for a Panel Study of Australian Retirees: Issues in Recruiting from Rare and Nonenumerated Populations Research on Aging, January 1, 2003; 25(1): 36 - 64. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J.-F. Etter, M. Cucherat, and T. V. Perneger Questionnaire Color and Response Rates to Mailed Surveys: A Randomizedtrial Anda Meta-Analysis Eval Health Prof, June 1, 2002; 25(2): 185 - 199. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. M. H. C. J. Lahaut, H. A. M. Jansen, D. van de Mheen, and H. F. L. Garretsen NON-RESPONSE BIAS IN A SAMPLE SURVEY ON ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION Alcohol Alcohol., May 1, 2002; 37(3): 256 - 260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. C. Newman, D. C. Des Jarlais, C. F. Turner, J. Gribble, P. Cooley, and D. Paone The Differential Effects of Face-to-Face and Computer Interview Modes Am J Public Health, February 1, 2002; 92(2): 294 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Z. Simsek and J. F. Veiga A Primer on Internet Organizational Surveys Organizational Research Methods, July 1, 2001; 4(3): 218 - 235. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. PICKERY, G. LOOSVELDT, and A. CARTON The Effects of Interviewer and Respondent Characteristics on Response Behavior in Panel Surveys: A Multilevel Approach Sociological Methods Research, May 1, 2001; 29(4): 509 - 523. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. L. Collins, P. L. Ellickson, R. D. Hays, and D. F. Mccaffrey Effects of Incentive Size and Timing on Response Rates to a Follow-Up Wave of a Longitudinal Mailed Survey Eval Rev, August 1, 2000; 24(4): 347 - 363. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. HOUTKOOP-STEENSTRA and H. van den BERGH Effects of Introductions in Large-Scale Telephone Survey Interviews Sociological Methods Research, February 1, 2000; 28(3): 281 - 300. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Cho and R. Larose Privacy Issues in Internet Surveys Social Science Computer Review, November 1, 1999; 17(4): 421 - 434. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Cioffi and R. Garner The Effect of Response Options on Decisions and Subsequent Behavior: Sometimes Inaction is Better Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 1998; 24(5): 463 - 472. [Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. P. Couper, E. Singer, and R. A. Kulka Participation in the 1990 Decennial Census: Politics, Privacy, Pressures American Politics Research, January 1, 1998; 26(1): 59 - 80. [Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. W. MAYNARD and N. C. SCHAEFFER Keeping the Gate: Declinations of the Request to Participate in a Telephone Survey Interview Sociological Methods Research, August 1, 1997; 26(1): 34 - 79. [Abstract]
|
|