Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (59)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DILLMAN, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by CLARK, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

TitleEFFECTS OF QUESTIONNAIRE LENGTH, RESPONDENT-FRIENDLY DESIGN, AND A DIFFICULT QUESTION ON RESPONSE RATES FOR OCCUPANT-ADDRESSED CENSUS MAIL SURVEYS
Author(s)DON A. DILLMANprofessor and director, MICHAEL D. SINCLAIRmathematical statistician, JON R. CLARKchief of the Census Data Quality Branch, The Social Economic Sciences Research Center, Washington State University, and senior survey methodologist at the U.S. Bureau of the CensusNational Analysts, formerly a mathematical statistician of the Census Data Quality Branch, Decennial Statistical Studies Division, U.S. Bureau of the CensusDecennial Statistical Studies Division, U.S. Bureau of the Census
IdentifiersPublic Opinion Quarterly, volume 57, page 289
Copyright© 1993, the American Association for Public Opinion Research
AvailabilityOther sites: JSTOR [No subscription required for AAPOR members] *

* For AAPOR membership information, or to login for access if already a member, please visit www.AAPOR.org.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
E. Martin
Can A Deadline and Compressed Mailing Schedule Improve Mail Response in the Decennial Census?
Public Opin Q, June 1, 2009; 73(2): 361 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
J. B. VanGeest, T. P. Johnson, and V. L. Welch
Methodologies for Improving Response Rates in Surveys of Physicians: A Systematic Review
Eval Health Prof, December 1, 2007; 30(4): 303 - 321.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
A. Peytchev, M. P. Couper, S. E. McCabe, and S. D. Crawford
Web Survey Design: Paging versus Scrolling
Public Opin Q, December 1, 2006; 70(4): 596 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
J.-F. Etter, M. Cucherat, and T. V. Perneger
Questionnaire Color and Response Rates to Mailed Surveys: A Randomizedtrial Anda Meta-Analysis
Eval Health Prof, June 1, 2002; 25(2): 185 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
J. L. Crompton and S. Tian-Cole
An Analysis of 13 Tourism Surveys: Are Three Waves of Data Collection Necessary?
Journal of Travel Research, May 1, 2001; 39(4): 356 - 368.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
M. P. Couper, E. Singer, and R. A. Kulka
Participation in the 1990 Decennial Census: Politics, Privacy, Pressures
American Politics Research, January 1, 1998; 26(1): 59 - 80.
[Abstract]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
A. N. Easton, J. H. Price, K. Boehm, and S. K. Telljohann
Sun Protection Counseling by Pediatricians
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, November 1, 1997; 151(11): 1133 - 1138.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of SociologyHome page
R. Axford, B. Carter, and G. Grunwald
Enhancing Dillman's total design method for mailed/ telephone surveys using current technology to maximise cost-benefit ratios
Journal of Sociology, January 1, 1997; 33(3): 387 - 393.
[Abstract] [PDF]